![[src + arch inside] Scientists create mice with two fathers after making eggs from male cells [620x581 - 293KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/ZiKBrM.png){kind=link}
Personally, I believe that human clones were abandoned, technology wise, due to possible ethics arguments. For instance: A rich enough person could grow their own clone for X amount of years and harvest organs along the way. Legal, illegal or somewhere in-between? (Realize eventually the government would step in and either outlaw or tax this "ability" to "death.") Ethically speaking, this scenario is an absolute nightmare. People could possibly take to the streets and protest worse than pro life/pro baby murder. (Abortion is only murder if the baby is White. We all have our own opinions, just sharing mine.) Not saying the likes of the rich like Bill Gates haven't been doing this for years, already. I'd assume they would keep this like nuclear codes state secrets.
ethics stopping the
richjews
laff
Yeah, same. Last two sentences of what I wrote. I do not trust kikes. I will not do business with them, if it can be avoided. So, publicly, no clones, due to ethics. Secret, probably rich people have clones, including white rich people like Trump
lowercase White
Do better.
Listen to 11.175MHz, Upper sideband.
Thanks, bird
In case you're wondering what that channel is, it's a government query and response frequency. You get a person reading a list of numbers and letters, and sometimes you get a reply from someone in an aircraft. There are repeaters all over the nation from that system, so you'll get groundcomm all the time but you may not hear any response from the birds in the air.
There's no key as to what those codes mean, but they started getting a lot more active when those "balloons" were in the air.
(post is archived)