WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/mar/08/scientists-create-mice-with-two-fathers-after-making-eggs-from-male-cells -> https://archive.md/lvRFg

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

“Purely in terms of technology, it will be possible [in humans] even in 10 years,”

So how're those human clones coming? It's been 27 years since Dolly and no news, what gives?

[–] 2 pts

Personally, I believe that human clones were abandoned, technology wise, due to possible ethics arguments. For instance: A rich enough person could grow their own clone for X amount of years and harvest organs along the way. Legal, illegal or somewhere in-between? (Realize eventually the government would step in and either outlaw or tax this "ability" to "death.") Ethically speaking, this scenario is an absolute nightmare. People could possibly take to the streets and protest worse than pro life/pro baby murder. (Abortion is only murder if the baby is White. We all have our own opinions, just sharing mine.) Not saying the likes of the rich like Bill Gates haven't been doing this for years, already. I'd assume they would keep this like nuclear codes state secrets.

[–] 3 pts

ethics stopping the rich jews

laff

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, same. Last two sentences of what I wrote. I do not trust kikes. I will not do business with them, if it can be avoided. So, publicly, no clones, due to ethics. Secret, probably rich people have clones, including white rich people like Trump

[–] 1 pt

Listen to 11.175MHz, Upper sideband.

[–] 1 pt

Thanks, bird

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Faglets, more likely. Infertility problems like, 'you're homo'