Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

350

I've never been sold on khazar theory, but there may be some truth to it, I find Edomites being more likely, or a combination. Don't have time to do a deep dive tonight, but here's a supposed excerpt from 4chan anon.

"Armenia, and our fathers [the Jews of Byzantium], fled before the idol-worshipers. The people of Khazaria, received them. For the people of Khazaria were at first without Torah, while their neighbour, remained without Torah and writing. They, intermingled with the inhabitants of the land, intermingled with the gentiles, learned their practices, and would continually go out with them to war: and they became one people. However, they were confirmed only in the covenant of circumcision;…”

I've never been sold on khazar theory, but there may be some truth to it, I find Edomites being more likely, or a combination. Don't have time to do a deep dive tonight, but here's a supposed excerpt from 4chan anon. "Armenia, and our fathers [the Jews of Byzantium], fled before the idol-worshipers. The people of Khazaria, received them. For the people of Khazaria were at first without Torah, while their neighbour, remained without Torah and writing. They, intermingled with the inhabitants of the land, intermingled with the gentiles, learned their practices, and would continually go out with them to war: and they became one people. However, they were confirmed only in the covenant of circumcision;…”

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

Can you specify where this info comes from and where the base material originates?

[–] • 0 pt

Found one excerpt on Khazars here:

Another of Schechter's early discoveries was the remains of an extensive literary epistle concerning the kingdom of the *Khazars. The ruler of this Caspian kingdom, and along with him many of his subjects, accepted Judaism before the ninth century. Some correspondence between the Khazar king Joseph and Ḥisdai ibn Shaprut had been published at the end of the 16th century and much later (in 1879) by Harkavy who used material brought from Cairo to Russia; the Cambridge document considerably increased the knowledge of the conversion and of subsequent Khazar history, and supplied many useful geographical details as well. In recent years still another Cambridge Genizah manuscript pertaining to the Khazars was discovered by N. Golb.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

jews aren't Judean, never have been. Fuck off with the "modern jews" vs "historical jews", they're the same, they are ancestors and decendatns. What they weren't / aren't is called the same thing. "jew" was never a thing in history, it was pharisee. I've seen some arguments on "canaanites" etc. but it all boils down to the lie that jews were from anywhere near israel Judea. They weren't.

"Khazars" are Turks, real Turks not jews. Just like jews aren't White, jews aren't Khazars, they subverted their way in. Asha Logos goes over this (the Khazar bit) in small amount in one of the first 4 videos. I forget which one, I know for a fact I've pointed it out to you before. You ask a lot of the same question then you get your answer then you ask it again at a later time. Why? Stop spamming.

They, intermingled with the inhabitants of the land, intermingled with the gentiles, learned their practices, and would continually go out with them to war...

jews fight war for / with nonjews

((()))

[–] • 0 pt

I'm with you. That's why I think Edomites, NOT judaens. This isn a spamming. New info i found, something i always want to get to the bottom of.