I have to disagree with you here.
n. <s&'prêm&se>
The state of being supreme, or in the highest station of power; highest or supreme authority or power; "the supremacy of a king or a parliament."
Fantastic. jews have power in banking and elsewhere. They do not, as jews, as you stated, have power in the sense of "jewish supremacy". They have power, supremacy, in the sense of banking supremacy. This is a tense argument and you're wrong. You're cucking your language for some reason.
i.e. When you say "jewish supremacy" the tense, context is derived from the modified noun - "jewish", which means you're stating that jews are racially supreme. They aren't.
You're cucking your language for some reason.
lol Not at all, you're the one trying to cuck words to match your mindset.
which means you're stating that jews are racially supreme.
Read the highlighted definition until you get it and stop trying to gaslight people are every turn, it's boring and useless.
Shut the fuck up AOU. You're a piece of work sometimes. You're wrong. I do not give a fuck about your cherry-picked definition. You are arguing over trying to and wanting to continue to label jews as a race as supreme. Not banking supremacy, banking power, or media etc. You want to call jews as holding racial supremacy.
(post is archived)