WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

359

Asked on one occasion “do you believe in God?” he responded with “I could talk for forty hours on what each word of that question means”. Which surely begged the follow-up “maybe you could but would you just answer the question?”. He is also tendentious and inconsistent on the issue of race.

He declares any argument based on racial differences to be “so muddleheaded that you hardly know where to start” but confines his criticism to Whites who apparently have no right to take pride in European cities just because you “happen to have the same skin color as some of the people” who built them. Strangely enough he has an entirely different attitude towards Native Americans who he encouraged to celebrate their unique culture and heritage.

And he has no problem with assigning disproportionate Jewish wealth and power to their high IQ while simultaneously professing outrage when differentials between Whites and blacks are attributed to the same cause.

In fact it’s reasonable to see him as a gatekeeper put in place to gaslight Whites – White males in particular – away from focusing on their real problems.

> Asked on one occasion “do you believe in God?” he responded with “I could talk for forty hours on what each word of that question means”. Which surely begged the follow-up “maybe you could but would you just answer the question?”. He is also tendentious and inconsistent on the issue of race. > He declares any argument based on racial differences to be “so muddleheaded that you hardly know where to start” but confines his criticism to Whites who apparently have no right to take pride in European cities just because you “happen to have the same skin color as some of the people” who built them. Strangely enough he has an entirely different attitude towards Native Americans who he encouraged to celebrate their unique culture and heritage. > And he has no problem with assigning disproportionate Jewish wealth and power to their high IQ while simultaneously professing outrage when differentials between Whites and blacks are attributed to the same cause. > In fact it’s reasonable to see him as a gatekeeper put in place to gaslight Whites – White males in particular – away from focusing on their real problems.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Asked on one occasion “do you believe in God?” he responded with “I could talk for forty hours on what each word of that question means”. Which surely begged the follow-up “maybe you could but would you just answer the question?”

The problem with this writer's statement is that when you know the person asking the question "Do you believe in God?" has a completely different concept of God than you have, it becomes impossible to answer the question. First, you must agree on what "God" is. Or at the very least, you must get the other person to explain his concept of God, so that you can either agree or disagree with it.

[–] 0 pt

. First, you must agree on what "God" is.

Not at all.

It's binary question.

Do you believe in God?

Yes or No

If the answer is Yes, which one. Then we can start talking for forty hours if you want to.

His “I could talk for forty hours on what each word of that question means” is bullshit. Nobody asked him to do that.

I'd rather talk with an AI, at least I'd know it doesn't try to bullshit me to avoid saying its a gatekeeping shabbos goy.

https://poal.co/s/Jewspiracy/602378/c9aff990-a7b4-4313-8547-f40a1555322e#cmnts