Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Edit: In before

"bu...bu..but Whiteys were also slave owners..."

Some of them were, but a one digit percentage isn't relevant and is just an attempt at diverting the topic and minimize the responsibility of jews ("No only jews did it!!!!") when they represented more than 90% of it (it's all documented in posts in this sub, in and ).

https://pic8.co/sh/QeQF9b.png

https://pic8.co/sh/OHi9nK.png

https://pic8.co/sh/fgcIA3.png

Edit: In before > "bu...bu..but Whiteys were also slave owners..." Some of them were, but a one digit percentage isn't relevant and is just an attempt at diverting the topic and minimize the responsibility of jews ("No only jews did it!!!!") when they represented more than 90% of it (it's all documented in posts in this sub, in /s/Truthhurts and /s/Kikes). https://pic8.co/sh/QeQF9b.png https://pic8.co/sh/OHi9nK.png https://pic8.co/sh/fgcIA3.png

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (24).
[–] • 0 pt

Ok, so one percent (assuming that’s true) is still 1 percent. Which means NOT ALL SLAVE OWNERS WERE JEWS THEN, DOESN’T IT?

That’s all I was saying.

If it’s 1 percent, then people can make up their own minds on how relevant that is or isn’t.

But again, that’s a different statement altogether than the one your post title makes.

Also, it’s funny how you get hung up on EXACT QUOTES WHEN IT SUITS YOU, but then revert back to “well 1 percent, but it’s irrelevant” when it suits you.

How about just speak the truth, man?

If it’s one percent, then just fucking say that.

[–] • 0 pt

Read my edit in the post content. This is what you're doing now.

[–] • 0 pt

I’m done dude. My point is made. This is a waste of my time at this point.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah I know.

jews aren't as bad because a minority of the slave owners weren't jews.