Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Edit: In before

"bu...bu..but Whiteys were also slave owners..."

Some of them were, but a one digit percentage isn't relevant and is just an attempt at diverting the topic and minimize the responsibility of jews ("No only jews did it!!!!") when they represented more than 90% of it (it's all documented in posts in this sub, in and ).

https://pic8.co/sh/QeQF9b.png

https://pic8.co/sh/OHi9nK.png

https://pic8.co/sh/fgcIA3.png

Edit: In before > "bu...bu..but Whiteys were also slave owners..." Some of them were, but a one digit percentage isn't relevant and is just an attempt at diverting the topic and minimize the responsibility of jews ("No only jews did it!!!!") when they represented more than 90% of it (it's all documented in posts in this sub, in /s/Truthhurts and /s/Kikes). https://pic8.co/sh/QeQF9b.png https://pic8.co/sh/OHi9nK.png https://pic8.co/sh/fgcIA3.png

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (24).
[–] • 0 pt

Trying to brand Whites as slave owners because a minuscule minority represented a single digit percent is specifically used to diminish the immense responsibility of jews.

If out of 100 slave owners, 1 wasn't jew, 99 were jews. That 1 goy isn't relevant.