Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Edit: In before

"bu...bu..but Whiteys were also slave owners..."

Some of them were, but a one digit percentage isn't relevant and is just an attempt at diverting the topic and minimize the responsibility of jews ("No only jews did it!!!!") when they represented more than 90% of it (it's all documented in posts in this sub, in and ).

https://pic8.co/sh/QeQF9b.png

https://pic8.co/sh/OHi9nK.png

https://pic8.co/sh/fgcIA3.png

Edit: In before > "bu...bu..but Whiteys were also slave owners..." Some of them were, but a one digit percentage isn't relevant and is just an attempt at diverting the topic and minimize the responsibility of jews ("No only jews did it!!!!") when they represented more than 90% of it (it's all documented in posts in this sub, in /s/Truthhurts and /s/Kikes). https://pic8.co/sh/QeQF9b.png https://pic8.co/sh/OHi9nK.png https://pic8.co/sh/fgcIA3.png

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (24).
[–] • 0 pt

Portuguese are European, like Spanish..are they not?

Hispanics are a mixed race of Spaniards/Portuguese and mestizo. So, not white?

What does it matter?

I’m simply stating the obvious: some slave owners in this country were white, of euro ancestry.

Again, not to let jews or whoever else off the hook. I’m not saying that the slave owners were exclusively white. They obviously weren’t.

But you are saying that slave owners were exclusively non-white…and that’s simply not true.

[–] • 0 pt

But you are saying that slave owners were exclusively non-white…and that’s simply not true.

Ok, how many percent of the slave owners were real Whites and not shapeshiting kikes (who changed their names to blend in) like they did with the Italian mafia in the U.S?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Oh I never said I knew the percentages of one versus the other.

If you want to say “the vast majority of slave owners were jews” or whatever else, you very may well be correct. Though I don’t think there’s any way for us to ever know the exact percentages..though we could definitely get close maybe..

But that’s a very different statement than “no white people in North America ever owned slaves.”

I mean, c’mon man. Now you’re trying a false equivalence argument on me?

FFS, my grandmother got way deep into genealogy and I know for a fact some of my ancestors owned slaves. And I’m 100% a Euro mutt.

[–] • 0 pt

If you want to say “the vast majority of slave owners were jews” or whatever else, you very may well be correct. Though I don’t think there’s any way for us to ever know the exact percentages..though we could definitely get close maybe..

We know for a fact (it's documented with plenty of posts in this sub) that the majority of slave traders and plantation/slave owners were jews.

Even if Whites were one digit percent of it, it's irrelevant. With or without that included, it wouldn't make a difference.

Don't forget that it's Whites (Europeans) who abolished slavery.

[–] • 0 pt

But that’s a very different statement than “no white people in North America ever owned slaves.”

Now you’re putting words in my mouth.

I never said North America.

The jewish slave trade happened all over the American continent, from the southern part of North America, through the Caribbean islands down to South America.