Jesus was circumcised, so it tells you a thing or two about his background

My problem is with myself and how I understood the "Esau" line versus Jacob line. My (self) saving grace is that I fully understood the "Judean" line and the (((intentional))) misstranslation therein.

I'm more interested to know where he came from.

Nazareth, a White Christian city as Judea was a White nation.

What is said in John 8:42-44 could be interpret, in my opinion, as the Jungs vision of God archetype, where in times of great trouble for Aryan people, their God would manifest through a great person who shoul lead them through the troubled times.

John 8:42-44;

You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

I think it's pretty clear. Jesus is not jewish, and jews are not of the Lord but of Satan which is well understood but jews, shills and )))cucks((( (as many in this thread) conflate.

Jung believed that Hitler was the manifestation of Wotan (God) archetype, and George Lincoln Rockwell believed Hitler was the second coming of Jesus Christ. Makes you think.

Jungian archetypes are defined as universal, primal symbols and images that derive from the collective unconscious, as proposed by Carl Jung. They are the psychic counterpart of instinct. It is described as a kind of innate unspecific knowledge, derived from the sum total of human history, which prefigures and directs conscious behavior.

I think man is very susceptible to false belief in another man's greatness due to his relative greatness. Also you probably know of Robert Sephyr and regardless of if you like or dislike him he goes over "universal innate knowledge" quite a bit in his videos and books.