>I'm not "maintaining" anything.
You know exactly what I mean, you being disingenuous doesn't help your case at all.
I'm simply asking is this what you believe. Your answer is, "I've proven it beyond a doubt, I've given you facts, etc."
Then I (if I wanted to pursue it which I don't) would simply come back with my own 'facts' and there we go.
Take care.
I'm simply asking is this what you believe.
What I "believe" is irrelevant. What you "believe" is irrelevant.
All that matters is what the possibilities are. There's a possibility the Jesus was blonde and blue. But there is no possibility whatsoever that he was any type of Jew. Regardless of anyone's definition of Jew.
I've asked for sources several times, if you wish to win a thinking person over to 'your side' on an internet forum you have to give objective sources, you refuse to reveal where you get your info.
So we're done, but I sincerely appreciate what info you did give.
I've asked for sources several times,
I gave you sources. The source of Joseph not being Jesus' biological father is in the New Testament. Jesus being called blonde and blue - The interview and letter to Caesar.
What do you expect? Am I required to prove the bible is the word of God? I never claimed the bible was the word of God. I just said that that is where it is written.
And/or it's common sense that the area was a part of the Roman Empire in biblical times, and it was where the Silk Road met the Mediterranean.
What sources do you not have? Or are you just grasping at straws because you don't want to agree with me, or admit you were wrong, and lied?
(post is archived)