Not exactly coherent.
That's some fancy hand waving you're doing there. I understand that this is the internet and some people here aren't fluent in english. But to those of us who are, this is perfectly coherent.
You can't be serious.
I am very serious. The Bible contains a contradiction. But if you would have read the VERY NEXT SENTENCE - You would have read how I explained how Jesus was still the savior despite the contradiction.
The fact remains - No matter what anyone's definition of Jew is, modern or biblical, Jesus was not any type of Jew. Joseph was. But Jesus wasn't Joseph's biological son. And Mary wasn't any type of Jew.
But if you would have read the VERY NEXT SENTENCE - You would have read how I explained how Jesus was still the savior despite the contradiction
Honestly I was stuck on the previous sentence wherein you claimed that Mary was pregnant before she met Joseph. That is false. I kinda get hung up on silly details like that sometimes and gloss over the rest of the bullshit.
Being the adopted son of a "Jew" is good enough for me. He is of royal lineage.
But the facts remain - Jesus was not ethnically or racially Jewish. - Jesus was not religiously Jewish.
And regardless of anyone's definition of Jew, Jesus was not a Jew in any way whatsoever. That's what this whole discussion is about.
Anyone who says Jesus was ethnically or racially Jewish, or the son of a Jew, is speaking blasphemies against the Son of God. And we all need to stop them from speaking blasphemies against Christ by showing them the facts.
(post is archived)