False. Jews are not Judahites. Jews are arabs. Arabs are Jews. This is both biblically and genetically an important distinction.
In Hebrew, Arab means "mixed; to mix." https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6151.htm
https://poal.co/c/dd5974e4-91d2-471d-aa37-6192ec9ad8fc#cmnts
Jesus' actual linage is not Jewish. His lineage is as follows: https://rense.com/general96/jesusnotjew.html
Next time, start your comment with, "My Jewish masters have instructed me to revise history by stating...."
But you too are already suspected of being a Jew. And of course, your comment does not reflect what was actually stated. In true Jew form, you project and accuse of what you are yourself doing. Which brings us back to the fact your are already suspected of being a Jew.
Jesus' step-father was Jewish. Mary did not meet Joseph until after she was pregnant.
Divine conception or not - Joseph (Jesus' step-father) being Jewish has nothing to do with Jesus' race/ethnicity.
And anyways, it's the mother that matters when it comes to "ethnic jews"
Was his mother jewish? No? She was what then? Buddhist?
Let's ask hadrian...
The reason people call Jesus a Jew is because the savior was to be a direct descendant of King David. Joseph was a direct descendant. But people ignore the fact that Jesus wasn't Joseph's biological son.
No one claims that Mary was a Jew because there is absolutely no evidence to support it. But there is evidence that she wasn't an ethnic/racial Jew.
"Biblical jews" are not "jews", they're Judeans. Otherwise yes but as Noisy pointed out these types of semantics are extremely important as they're how kikes planted these lies in the first place.
Yes he was.
And Christianity (Christ Jesus) is antitype, the fulfillment, of the OT sacrifices and the embodiment of the law.
Jesus did indeed practice 'Judaism' or Hebraism whichever you like.
I don't understand people going against the greatest theologians of all time, and the scriptures themselves.
Judaism is derived from the Babylonian Tradition Of The Elders. It was created after Christianity. Christianity derives from Hebrewism.
Hebrewism (Old Testament) -> Christianity (New Testament)
Babylonian Tradition Of The Elders -> Judaism -> Talmud
You've read more than enough to know the difference. Once again you are exposed as a subversive and caught in a lie.
Your comment directly contradicts the scriptures. Stop with the lying claiming your comment is supported by it. Jesus himself via scripture says you are a liar.
Where do you guys get this stuff?
Because you hate the jews so much (and rightly so...see what I said there?) you have to twist historical facts.
If you deny that Jesus was of Old Testament Hebrew lineage then you deny Him as the promised savior.
Tell me, what book did you read that put you on this stupid course?
Because you 'read a book' then you got the truth.
Because one dumbass book that goes against all the greatest theologians of history gives you the truth?
Look, Jesus, who was a jew, condemned the jews, he condemned his own people.
Not because they were 'jews,' but because they rejected Him and were self-righteous hypocrites who thought they were better than everyone else. That's enough to make them evil.
Jesus did indeed practice 'Judaism' or Hebraism whichever you like.
Jesus Christ practised Christianity. Jesus "Christ".... "Christ"ianity...... It's right there in the name.
Jesus hated Judaism/Hebraism so much he created a whole new religion.
How do you not know this?
You're misunderstanding me. Jesus honored the law and the ceremonial way of worship (including the sacrifices) instituted by God through Moses while he lived. (Let's drop the term Judaism, fair enough.)
This was right and proper, until his death which fulfilled the ceremonial worship, the sacrifices were a type of Christ.
When the Israelites rejected Christ the ceremonial way of worship (sacrifices and feasts) were terminated, and the Israelites having failed to accept this, and Christ as the messiah, they (the nation and their temple and their worship) were finally overthrown via the judgment of God in 70 ad.
It was not a 'whole new religion' in the sense that the ceremonial worship, everything about it, the feasts, sacrifices, everything, were typifying Christ.
The OT believers knew this and they knew the sacrifices were a type of the one coming great and final sacrifice of Christ to take away sin. OT believers were saved through their forward looking faith in Christ, typified by the sacrifices.
(post is archived)