Correct one, also woops, I wrote 0 instead of 9 but you got it.

But you too are already suspected of being a Jew. And of course, your comment does not reflect what was actually stated. In true Jew form, you project and accuse of what you are yourself doing. Which brings us back to the fact your are already suspected of being a Jew.

The reason people call Jesus a Jew is because the savior was to be a direct descendant of King David. Joseph was a direct descendant. But people ignore the fact that Jesus wasn't Joseph's biological son.

No one claims that Mary was a Jew because there is absolutely no evidence to support it. But there is evidence that she wasn't an ethnic/racial Jew.

Wasn't the label Jews created to refer to the Judeans?

It's 'bopper' stupid, not 'booper.'

Hebrewism

Hebraism*, but yes.

Where do you guys get this stuff?

Because you hate the jews so much (and rightly so...see what I said there?) you have to twist historical facts.

If you deny that Jesus was of Old Testament Hebrew lineage then you deny Him as the promised savior.

Tell me, what book did you read that put you on this stupid course?

Because you 'read a book' then you got the truth.

Because one dumbass book that goes against all the greatest theologians of history gives you the truth?

Look, Jesus, who was a jew, condemned the jews, he condemned his own people.

Not because they were 'jews,' but because they rejected Him and were self-righteous hypocrites who thought they were better than everyone else. That's enough to make them evil.

You're misunderstanding me. Jesus honored the law and the ceremonial way of worship (including the sacrifices) instituted by God through Moses while he lived. (Let's drop the term Judaism, fair enough.)

This was right and proper, until his death which fulfilled the ceremonial worship, the sacrifices were a type of Christ.

When the Israelites rejected Christ the ceremonial way of worship (sacrifices and feasts) were terminated, and the Israelites having failed to accept this, and Christ as the messiah, they (the nation and their temple and their worship) were finally overthrown via the judgment of God in 70 ad.

It was not a 'whole new religion' in the sense that the ceremonial worship, everything about it, the feasts, sacrifices, everything, were typifying Christ.

The OT believers knew this and they knew the sacrifices were a type of the one coming great and final sacrifice of Christ to take away sin. OT believers were saved through their forward looking faith in Christ, typified by the sacrifices.

a

He was the goyim.

There are maybe 2 users on here with true, biblical, orthodox beliefs about Jesus, God, the gospel of grace, etc.

And doginventer ain't one of them.

If you don't think there's a [sin] problem, you're going to hell.
If you do think there's a problem, and believe that something in creation (a created christ, or your own works) is going to save you, you are going to hell.

No. That's not what I said. "jew" doesn't stem from Judean / Judea so it doesn't follow for "Germanish".

people of milk

So lactose tolerant. Which Whites are. Which again solves a different (((argument))).

I don't know. It's always claimed as a proper translation of various Hebrew (not jew language), Greek, or other language of pre-antiquity. But that's (((intentional))) to start the lie. Judean does not = jewish, "jewish" = pharisee(s). Read up on them and their mention in the bible, it's not good.

A Jew is an arab (in Hebrew; "mixed"). The bible explicitly talks about this. The Judahites were taken into captivity. Later the lands were conquered. The Judeans went into and came out. But not entirely whole. Many cross bred with many other races (and ethnicities). Which is why they are now arab. There are some Jews who actually have Hebrew bloodlines but a mix. There are some Jews who are not related to Hebrews. There are many who crossbred with the Amaleks and Babylonians and Phoenicians, and so on and so on... Many of these in turn crossbred. Some of which are of Hebrew bloodlines. Some not. Regardless, they largely crossbred with non-Israelites and non-Judeans. Which is why Jews are arabs. The link I provide above confirms today's arabs (example, Palestinians) are basically Jews. And Jews are basically Palestinians. This is in addition to the number of people who were already practitioners of Tradition of the Elders is Babylon and many surrounding lands. Which in turn includes many other peoples (races and ethnicities). Obviously you can understand how this creates much confusion and opportunity for conflation.

The religion carried back out of Canaan by the arab Jews and back into Judah is the Babylonian Tradition Of The Elders. Which they then wrapped with a facade of Hebrewism. The result is Judah was a very mixed land at this point who had all but abandoned Hebrewism (some still did - they are Judahites). But all of these people were collectively called Judeans at this point. As a result, a ton of people called themselves Judahites and attempted to not only falsely claim lineage as Tribe of Judah and associated privilege, they also usurped the Tribe of Levi and established themselves as the new religious clergy class. Itself a sin against God and Hebrewism.

In this mixing is why Jesus harshly rebukes them when they declare they too are the children of Abraham. He says they are of the seed (mixed) but that their father is Satan (Amaleks, Canaanites, etc., ...). This gets even more confusing because most of these people come from Noah in some form or fashion. Though it is implied, as it was in Eden (Cain & Nod and other cities), Satan had also made/corrupted new groups of people. This is why the Amaleks were commanded to be genocided by God. Some of whom now called themselves Judeans.

IMOHO, "Jew" is the attempt to correct the record in the distinction of Judahite (directly from Abraham) vs Jew (arab and the great mixing).

In short, Christianity is the direct response to the corruptions of Jews and Satan upon the world. This is why "judeo-Christianity" is a complete lie. Christianity responded to their corruption. The response to Christianity is the formal creation of Judaism and Islam (created by a white, blue/grey eyed, red haired guy named Mohammed).

See here for another comment on some of this: https://poal.co/s/Jewspiracy/585332/e3bb333e-41fc-4dcd-838c-5f33322d420d

Start here for a deeper dive: https://poal.co/s/Jewspiracy/585332/e1256423-23c3-43cb-b981-0f9e2e9df91a

What do you even call a jew then?

A Jew can be a racial/ethnic Jew. Jesus' step-father Joseph can be considered a racial Jew. But because Jesus and his step-father have no genetic link, Jesus is not a Jew just because Joseph was.

A Jew can be someone who practices Judaism. Jesus Christ practiced Christianity. Hence the "Christ" in "Christ"ianity.

The arguments about modern "Jews" and their links (or lack of links) to religions and peoples of the past are irrelevant. Jesus has no genetic link to his step-father, and Jesus practiced the religion he created, Christianity.

Sounds like you're reading your own comment history.

The thing is, the old 'divines' that I'm talking about, they believed the jews would be saved, en masse, at a future date.

Meaning they are salvageable, no matter how wicked they've become. And they've become about as wicked as men can be.

Too many people on here almost would say they (and negroes) have no souls (which is unscriptural).

Lol might seem that way sometimes, but all men have a soul.

I sure wish the best for you, I would start with someone simple, like Thomas Watson, or John Bunyan.

A great church, a sound one (there aren't many) is the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland.