![Off the leash [700x871 - 593KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/S0PjlW.png){kind=link}
No. If the guy draws in one undecided teenager its OK to me. You cant change evryones mind on your own even itf you're the clutch. Nobody even thinks 'cannibal' when Milo destroys Islam apologists.
...when Milo destroys Islam apologists.
That doesn't happen though. Has he called out netenyau's allegiance with various (every) muslim terrorist faction? No he hasn't. He fooled you because he said a few totally ebin "anti" muslim things in a tweet. So he "destroyed" muslims and their apologists, great. While being a faggot, a nigger lover, a jew, and a supporter of child sex. You are fucked. You are directly supporting all of the above yourself by pushing so hard against being informed how controlled opposition works.
I saw the clip with the Aussie-Islam presenter chick. (find it yourself). He undrstood the meaning of practicing Islam better than the Islamic bitch herself. Great job done. Would i encourage my son to follow him? No.
Get some nuance Cluch.
If the guy draws in one undecided teenager its OK to me.
What do you mean by this though?
I mean: He can pull people to listen to stuff they would dismiss automatically. I bet he had more influence for good, overall, in balance, bottom line, than bad. I bet he woke a few guys up and never made a dude want to bend over for dick. Or eat people...
I bet he woke a few guys up and never made a dude want to bend over for dick. Or eat people...
Okay? I'd bet that too. However he did argue for pedophilia as positive between men and boys. Which with your current support of him then lends itself to pedophilia being more accepted in common discourse. His existence as a jew, a faggot, a pedo, a nigger-lover are all now more accepted in circles in which they are not acceptable. So you're making the claim that I meant to imply he somehow caused dudes to "suck dick" or "eat people" is ludicrous. What he did though was to further institute a public discourse of acceptance of those things in addition to other degeneracies. So while he may not be the direct cause for any individual act of degeneracy another individual has partaken, he is still guilty for that act being something the person even though was acceptable. It's why is a law. While I fully disagree with it, I can understand the logic behind it. And while I disagree and understand the logic behind it I also understand that it's used far to broadly by websites to crack down. The reason being is that if I tell person X to kill person Y and person X does so then I do in fact have some fault there. Just as milo has fault for instances of degeneracy happening even if not directly. The discourse is changed.
(post is archived)