>I bet he woke a few guys up and never made a dude want to bend over for dick. Or eat people... Okay? I'd bet that too. However he did argue for pedophilia as positive between men and boys. Which with your current support of him then lends itself to pedophilia being more accepted in common discourse. His existence as a jew, a faggot, a pedo, a nigger-lover are all now more accepted in circles in which they are not acceptable. So you're making the claim that I meant to imply he somehow caused dudes to "suck dick" or "eat people" is ludicrous. What he did though was to further institute a public discourse of acceptance of those things in addition to other degeneracies. So while he may not be the direct cause for any individual act of degeneracy another individual has partaken, he is still guilty for that act being something the person even though was acceptable. It's why [18 USC § 373 - Solicitation to commit a crime of violence](https://archive.md/wSIpO) is a law. While I fully disagree with it, I can understand the logic behind it. And while I disagree and understand the logic behind it I also understand that it's used far to broadly by websites to crack down. The reason being is that if I tell person X to kill person Y and person X does so then I do in fact have some fault there. Just as milo has fault for instances of degeneracy happening even if not directly. The discourse is changed.