![A literal coverup [533x566 - 449KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/RLx1m3.png){kind=link}
I read the write up at the link provided by our fellow commentor. They seem to have done a thorough imaging, but all concussions presented thereon are supposition upon hearsay upon prior articles upon guesswork upon conflicting eyewitness testimony. They also make some pretty large assumptions based on prior assumptions presented in previous works. The biggest assumption seems to be that eyewitness testimony is truthful and accurate. Remove those descriptions from the analysis and the empirical proof for their conclusions lacks any reasonable basis whatsoever.
Ground depressions are indicative of graves just as easily as they are indicative of buried trash, and bricks and tile fragments just as indicative of a bakery as they are of a gas chamber. I am very much underwhelmed by the objective support and reasoning presented. Seems to me they are taking everything that they find and attempting to validate prior testimony with each piece without considering the pieces or the findings on their own to reach conclusions without bias. If you are only looking for pieces to verify the stories you have been told, that isn't science it's advocacy.
They seem to have done a thorough imaging, but all concussions presented thereon are supposition upon hearsay upon prior articles upon guesswork
Only if you ignore all of the evidence of there being tons of dead bodies there in the past including the "Jew-gold rush" where folks were digging up the bodies to get their jewelry, gold teeth, etc.
The imaging activity was not to prove whether or not there were bodies, there. The imaging activity was to prove there were mass graves to discredit Krege's dishonest GDR "study."
What the study does not do is determine the number of bodies. It has no way to determine that. But it did, inexorably, prove there were multiple mass graves thus destroying Krege's "study." I say "study" because Krege had to falsify his findings, deliberately, to conclude what he did. Folks doubt if he actually had a GDR when he did his work. He said the soil was indisturbed and scanned down to 30 meters and found nothing as if nothing ever happened, there. Odd that this other study directly contradicts all of that. Also odd that Krege would ignore the evidence from the Jewish Gold Rush where the ground was literally dug up, disturbed immensely, but was reburied and recovered when the Cabal put a stop do it (for whatever reason - maybe they didn't want body counting to occur, maybe it was to let the dead rest as they claim, maybe it was because they needed to control the narrative at the time).
But it did, inexorably, prove there were multiple mass graves
I must have missed the support for this conclusion. Please list specifically which findings given support the proof of the existence of mass graves.
Please list the support that concludes that the ground is undisturbed, that there are 0 anomalies in the ground, to support Krebe's conclusion, FIRST, before I just link you right back to the same study that has already been linked.
First, prove your position. This other study was done in part to prove or disprove Krebe's "study." Be my guest.
In fact, explain the actual dead bodies photographed and documented on that same site back in the 1940s and the subsequent Jewish Gold Rush to support Krebe's position that that never happened. This was a full 10 years before the narrative was being built about the 6 gorillion. So that argument will not fly. We have irrefutable evidence that that sit was used for mass graves. Krebe's disagreed and made himself look like a dumbass.
(post is archived)