WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

879

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I cited this study the one you claim proves mass graves that doesnt.

It does. For sure.

It 100% proves Klege wrong. Cry more that you believed a charlatan and now your feelings are hurt.

Remember, the issue is not that the Third Reich never killed Jews. They did. A lot of them. The issue is the inflation of the numbers to 6 million. Wherever you find these stories, you'll find stories of dubious body count claims.

Post your evidence that all those photos, military documentation, and police documentation was all fabricated.

[–] 0 pt

Krege never published his GPR profiles which is why revisionists don't accept his claims. Neither has CS-C published her GPR scans but you demand that we accept her word that there are areas that are "probable" grave sites. Sell such bullshit down the street.

[–] 0 pt

Krege never published his GPR profiles which is why revisionists don't accept his claims.

Scroll down to the section labeled "The Computer Image of Treblinka"

Results Found: Almost all of the ground consists of undisturbed soil, sand and rocks. The trees are over 50 years o

https://codoh.com/library/document/the-1999-krege-report-on-the-treblinka/en/

Neither has CS-C published her GPR scans

She did. It's in their results. Many.

Since you're wrong about both things, now what?

[–] 0 pt

That article was published by CODOH in 2012. Go to the CODOH Forum for discussion post 2012. Krege never published a complete report and his claims were eventually dropped as any proof for what happened at Treblinka. Krege showed one (1) GPR scan but not any complete GPR profile for the Treblinka camp.

You claim that CS-C published her GPR profile of Treblinka. She didn't. She published her electrical resistivity results exhaustively but, like Krege, showed only one (1) GPR scan that she claimed showed a straight edge of a "probable" grave. In one case she claimed to have found five probable graves using only GPR but never showed any GPR scans of those graves. Earlier in her theses she showed electrical resistivity reflections that she claimed represented those same graves.

Since you're wrong about both things, now what?