WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

639

(post is archived)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1296207418300189

I cited this study the one you claim proves mass graves that doesnt. Post proof of bodies nigger.

[–] 0 pt

I cited this study the one you claim proves mass graves that doesnt.

It does. For sure.

It 100% proves Klege wrong. Cry more that you believed a charlatan and now your feelings are hurt.

Remember, the issue is not that the Third Reich never killed Jews. They did. A lot of them. The issue is the inflation of the numbers to 6 million. Wherever you find these stories, you'll find stories of dubious body count claims.

Post your evidence that all those photos, military documentation, and police documentation was all fabricated.

[–] 0 pt

Krege never published his GPR profiles which is why revisionists don't accept his claims. Neither has CS-C published her GPR scans but you demand that we accept her word that there are areas that are "probable" grave sites. Sell such bullshit down the street.

[–] 0 pt

Krege never published his GPR profiles which is why revisionists don't accept his claims.

Scroll down to the section labeled "The Computer Image of Treblinka"

Results Found: Almost all of the ground consists of undisturbed soil, sand and rocks. The trees are over 50 years o

https://codoh.com/library/document/the-1999-krege-report-on-the-treblinka/en/

Neither has CS-C published her GPR scans

She did. It's in their results. Many.

Since you're wrong about both things, now what?