![A literal coverup [533x566 - 449KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/RLx1m3.png){kind=link}
That's an image. As we know, especially on poal, people like to throw random shit onto an image and then pretend it is magically more accurate like we are a bunch of superstitious savages who believe anything as long as it was edited to an image.
But what about an article from a credible institution instead of holocaust deniers (Krege is a holocaust denier)?
In 2010, such a study was undertaken with a GDR, like Krege claimed to have used.
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-16657363
I'm suspect of the BBC article, I want to see that scientist's actual research.
Found one of her sites:
But I want published research.
https://www.staffs.ac.uk/research/projects/finding-treblinka-project
Blank. Where is it?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1296207418300189
Found it!!!
Okay, there's your research. And we have the scans, too! And this is peer reviewed. Perfect.
Here's what he research does not do: it does not give us a body count. Here's what her research does do: it confirms that there are multiple mass graves. Krege is wrong and deceitfully so. But we all knew that. But he's right to call into question the body count.
Okay, there's your research.
Where? The link is an abstract - there is no information there. Where is the article with the data, methodology, assumptions, stated error and limitations of the study, and opinions/conclusions?
You wrote a lot of words and showed nothing.
Hes a fucking kike. Here's the study he linked too on scihub without the fucking paywall. https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.culher.2018.04.012 Dude is a stupid fucking nigger that thinks people can't look up a god damn study on scihub and read it.
Thanks for the link. It says they did a thorough survey that will be available for further analysis. All mention of buildings and graves are incorporated from other writings or pure speculation. This whole topic is a ghost with everyone reusing everyone else's guesswork. There's no substance to any of it.
Can you get a copy of Reference #3: The Heart of Terror: A Forensic and Archaeological Assessment of the Old Gas Chambers at Treblinka. Caroline Sturdy Colls & Kevin Colls. They claim to have done further analysis using the imaging from this article.
I have access to it. You have to pay for it or have access to it through your institution.
If you are genuinely interested in the research, you can e-mail and she will likely send it to you for free.
I can see the scans, images, markups, each section, etc.
She even states that this does not give us a body count - it only gives us evidence of mass graves. Body counts are impossible to conduct, now.
I read the write up at the link provided by our fellow commentor. They seem to have done a thorough imaging, but all concussions presented thereon are supposition upon hearsay upon prior articles upon guesswork upon conflicting eyewitness testimony. They also make some pretty large assumptions based on prior assumptions presented in previous works. The biggest assumption seems to be that eyewitness testimony is truthful and accurate. Remove those descriptions from the analysis and the empirical proof for their conclusions lacks any reasonable basis whatsoever.
Ground depressions are indicative of graves just as easily as they are indicative of buried trash, and bricks and tile fragments just as indicative of a bakery as they are of a gas chamber. I am very much underwhelmed by the objective support and reasoning presented. Seems to me they are taking everything that they find and attempting to validate prior testimony with each piece without considering the pieces or the findings on their own to reach conclusions without bias. If you are only looking for pieces to verify the stories you have been told, that isn't science it's advocacy.
Bullshit you have access to it. It's on fucking sci hub kike. Post it faggot.
"it confirms that there are multiple mass graves." https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.culher.2018.04.012 Here's the paper it doesn't confirm that. It confirms there are several depressions that could be mass graves. Could also be just other structural slabs that were buried or pits where debris from dismantling of the structures was pushed and buried at the end of the war or numerous other things. All it concludes with is really that the dirt was disturbed in those places because this is all just surface level scans with various instruments fused together.
You cited the same study. And we have evidence of bodies from years past, already. Whether or not there were bodies there is not in question at all. Folks dug up the cite looking for Jewish gold and things and this was well documented. What is in question is how many people died there.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1296207418300189
I cited this study the one you claim proves mass graves that doesnt. Post proof of bodies nigger.
So where are the GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) profiles? Carolyn Sturdy-Colls (CS-C) claims to have surveyed the entire area with GPR but shows one (1) scan that shows close to fuck all. She uses electrical resistivity to show "reflections" that she claims could represent "possible" graves. Where's the fucking GPR profiles that show actual underground structure? Lots of smoke and bullshit about "geophysics" and "archaeology" but NO FUCKING GPR profiles. Your "new research" is bullshit.
(post is archived)