Judaism is based on talmud, contrary to popular belief I'm talking about mainstream judaism, "rabbinic judaism", which is pharisees legacy. Table, at the bottom https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/pharisees-sadducees-and-essenes details matter If you watch this video, you'll learn everything you need to know https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSy6ENVAJlY

https://able2know.org/topic/155141-1 https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Judaism/talmud_child_sex.htm http://www.whale.to/c/thoughts_from_the_talmud.html http://come-and-hear.com/editor/p_america_2.html http://www.jesuswasnotajew.org/the-babylonian-talmud.html https://hshidayat.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/the-satanic-verses-of-the-jewish-talmud-and-zionism/ https://davidduke.com/isis-horror-ok-rape-non-believers-media-covers-judaic-sexual-horror/ Also there's this; https://www.fisheaters.com/jcintro.html This Catholic site is a great resource on Jews in general. There's several MP3's, PDFs on history, videos, articles etc calling out their disgusting nature. Part 1 https://www.fisheaters.com/lettertobenyachov.html One student raises a hand: "I don't understand verse 5:4 of the tractate Niddah. What does the phrase 'it is like a finger in eye' mean?" The teacher responds, "This refers to the hymen of a girl younger than three years old. The Sages believed that in the case of toddler rape, the hymen would fully grow back by the time the girl reached adulthood and married. Therfore, though violated, she would still technically be counted as a virgin and could marry a priest. It's an analogy: poking your finger in the eye is uncomortable, but causes no lasting harm." There is a collective gasp of breath among students. Their dismay is palpable. They do not like this particular talmudic text or the men behind it. But its authors, the talmudic rabbis, hardly wrote it with this particular group of students in mind -- mostly thirty- and forty-year old women in suburban Philadelphia taking a four-week class titled 'Women in Jewish Law' at their Reform synagogue. The questioner perists. 'I don't understand. Are you saying this refers to the rape of a three year-old girl?' "Or younger," the teacher responds dryly. "I don't see how it says anything about rape and hymens. You must be mistaken. I don't believe the rabbis are talking about rape at all. I think this statement has nothing to do with the rest of the passage." The teacher (I'll admit now that it was me, a second-year rabbinic student) responds, "Well, that's the common understanding. What do you think it means?" The woman is clearly agitated, "I don't know, but I do know that it couldn't be about child rape." This is week three of the class. The woman does not return for week four. Denial. Another source mentioning sex with 3 year olds and some examples of what it mentions; https://prepareforchange.net/2019/03/31/talmud-research-zionist-views-on-non-jews-non-jews-are-beasts-to-serve-us-as-slaves/ 39 ‘Sexual intercourse between Goyim is like intercourse between animals’ (Sanhedrin 74b) / “Sexual intercourse with Non-Jews is like sexual intercourse with animals.” (Kethuboth 3b) 46 “Pederasty (that is, sex relations between men and especially between man and boys, Ed.) with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that…if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred.” (Sanhedrin 54b) 47 “When a grown man has had intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this, less than three years old, it is as if one puts the finger into the eye. Tears come to the eye again and again, so does the virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (Kenthuboth 11b)