Harvard professor either doesn't understand the second amendment or maliciously does.

As if changing the words on the page alters in any way each man's inherent possession of those rights or his responsibility to exercise and defend them.

Are they trying to make vaxx mandates even more unconstitutional while removing rights?

People just don't get it. They read the Second Amendment as if it meant:

A government-controlled army is necessary for the security of any free country, including the United States. Citizens shall be allowed to keep and bear arms to ensure that the government can raise an army quickly.

They are shocked and appalled to learn that it means:

A country of free men who are unarmed against their government will not long remain free, therefore all citizens shall have the unfettered right to keep and take up arms against their government whenever it shall become necessary.

I would suggest the 1st and 2nd Amendments do need to be adjusted. The First Amendment should have criminal penalties for the outright Lies of MSM and politicians. The Second Amendment should state very plainly that the reason the citizen shall always be armed is to 'replace by force' a Anti-American liberal/communist COUP that has infested our Gov., which is exactly what it means.

"Mary Anne Franks". Every single time.