Appears to be a Karaite-like 'Hebrew' speaking?
I agree with some of it but
If you've already established that Jews have perverted texts & adopted evil teachings or practices, one way or another, then you do not need to go out of your way to focus on "Sabbatean Frankism" as if it was any different to the other Jews. The so-called "libel" predates Sabbatai Zevi, it's more likely that the Sabbateans & Frankists were just a more wilfully antinomian variation or evolution of what they already upheld & practiced. They were very popular amongst Jews, millions joined the ranks and I highly doubt they disappeared like Jews claim. That cult and all the weird, sadistic cults they've been involved with since are simply a reflection of Jewish character & spirit...
To adopt the Race Denialism promoted by the very same Kikes that you are criticising is quite odd. The Bible is very "racist," as was the early Christian interpretation. In fact, Europeans only ceased the desire to maintain that 'racism' when Jews consolidated hegemony over them and started brainwashing them from childhood to ignore their analytical or moral side and accept their own genocide...
God cursed Canaan and his descendants, based on the actions of his father (incest). That equates to cursing an entire race of people. Ham is neither cursed, nor blessed, but Shem & Japheth, as well as their descendants are blessed. This creates a racial hierarchy based on the actions of progenitors. According to Biblical record, Canaanites were never actually successfully genocided, despite that being a direct command from God after they had refused to repent of their ways (hundreds of years was given prior).
"Massacre of Innocents" (depicting Herod) by Matteo Di Giovanni (qu.ax)
Lam 4:6 And the crookedness of the daughter of my people Is greater than the punishment of the sin of Seḏom, Which was overthrown in a moment, And no hands were wrung over her! Lam 4:7 Her Nazirites (consecrated ones) were brighter than snow And whiter than milk; More ruddy in body than rubies, Their cut [/"polishing"/ eyes] like sapphire. Lam 4:8 Their appearance has become blacker than soot; They have become unrecognised in the streets; Their skin has shrivelled on their bones, It has become dry, it has become as wood.
Whole of Proverbs 5 warns against miscegenation. Pro 5:20 For why should you, my son, Be captivated by a strange woman, And embrace the bosom of a foreigner? They were commanded to not mix with Canaanites, which ought not to be taken lighter than the commandment of not reproducing outside of marriage or reproducing within consanguine relations. The offspring of mixtures are illegitimate, which is why they had a different label for mixed multitudes (like the Edomites, whom were all at least half-Canaanite.)
Deu 7:3 “And do not intermarry with them – you do not give your daughter to his son, and you do not take his daughter for your son,
Deu 28:32 “Your sons and your daughters are given to another people, and your eyes look and fail for them all day long, and your hand powerless. Deu 28:33 “A people whom you have not known eat the fruit of your land and all your labours. And you shall be only oppressed and crushed all the days.
Arab - https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6154.htm https://poal.co/static/images/Joaukg.jpg Jer 50:37 “A sword is upon their horses, and upon their chariots, and upon all the mixed peoples [/foreigners] who are in her midst, and they shall become like women. A sword is upon her treasures, and they shall be plundered.
Mat 15:24 And He answering, said, "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Yisra’ěl."
Mat 10:5 Yahshua sent these twelve out, having commanded them, saying, “Do not go into the way of the nations, and do not enter a city of the Shomeronim, Mat 10:6 but rather go to the lost sheep of the house of Yisra’ěl.
Amo 3:1 Hear this word that YHWH has spoken against you, O children of Yisra’ěl, against the entire clan which I brought up from the land of Mitsrayim, saying, Amo 3:2 “You alone have I known of all the clans of the earth, therefore I punish you for all your crookednesses.”
Deu 28:43 “The sojourner who is among you rises higher and higher above you, but you come down lower and lower. Deu 28:44 “He lends to you, but you do not lend to him. He is the head, and you are the tail.
Mal 3:14 “You have said, ‘It is worthless to serve Elohim. And what did we gain when we guarded His Charge, and when we walked as mourners before YHWH of hosts? Mal 3:15 And now we are calling the proud blessed – not only are the doers of wrongness built up, but they also try Elohim and escape.’ ”
Num 33:55 "And if you do not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you, then it shall be that those whom you let remain shall be pricks in your eyes and thorns in you. Num 33:56 And it shall be that I do to you as I thought to do to them.’ ”
1Pe 2:9 But you are a chosen race (biblehub.com), a royal priesthood, a set-apart nation (biblehub.com), a people for a possession, that you should proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvellous light,
Does this seem like the character of a God that is wilfully blind to genetic inheritance, or race? One that advocates global homogenisation? Why create a "set-apart" people if you are not opposed to them mixing with everyone, and they, by do so, inherently lose the physical attributes that make them seem "set-apart" from other peoples? If Morphology & cosmetic allele expression was entirely random, then you could easily argue that it is entirely superfluous, but it's actually an indicator of inheritance. Babies look at peoples faces and compare them with their parents to determine whether they are part of the same family/ tribe & therefore trusted (That isn't 'learnt behaviour,' that's a defence mechanism). Not only that but genetic health is also indicated by the symmetry of morphology.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/nation - 'Civnats' did not exist until recently... Even Empires made a distinction between conquered subjects and nation-stock citizens. https://vid8.poal.co/user/archibald/0CUdqpv
So therefore, what could this parable potentially mean?
Mat 13:24 Another parable He put before them, saying, “The reign of the heavens has become like a man who sowed good seed in his field, Mat 13:25 but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed darnel [darnel looks like wheat but is poisonous to man and beast] among the wheat and went away. Mat 13:26 “And when the blade sprouted and bore fruit, then the darnel also appeared. Mat 13:27 “And the servants of the master of the house came and said to him, ‘Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? From where then does it have the darnel?’ Mat 13:28 “And he said to them, ‘A man, an enemy did this.’ And the servants said to him, ‘Do you wish then, that we go and gather them up?’ Mat 13:29 “But he said, ‘No, lest while you gather up the darnel you also uproot the wheat with them. Mat 13:30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and at the time of harvest I shall say to the reapers, “First gather the darnel and bind them in bundles to burn them, but gather the wheat into my granary.”
Another Parable about the "Kingdom of the Heavens" references genetic adaptation- Matt 13:31 Another parable He put before them, saying, “The reign of the heavens is like a mustard seed, which a man took and sowed in his field, Matt 13:32 which indeed is less than all the seeds, but when it is grown it is greater than the plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the heaven come and dwell in its branches.”
[The mustard seed is among the smallest seeds, and is apart of the Brassica genus. The Jersey cabbage (Brassica oleracea longata) (files.catbox.moe) is one amongst a variety of plants artificially selected from Wild Mustard. It just so happens to tower above all the other garden plants, almost appearing as a tree. Although it lacks branches.]
Mar 8:14 And they had forgotten to take bread, and they did not have more than one loaf with them in the boat. Mar 8:15 And He was warning them, saying, “Mind! Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees.” Mar 8:16 And they were reasoning with one another, saying, “Because we have no bread.” Mar 8:17 And Yahshua, being aware of it, said to them, “Why do you reason because you have no bread? Do you not yet perceive nor understand? Is your heart still hardened? Mar 8:18 “Having eyes, do you not see? And having ears, do you not hear? And do you not remember?
Joh 8:42 Yahshua said to them, “If Elohim were your Father, you would love Me, for I came forth from Elohim, and am here. For I have not come of Myself, but He sent Me. Joh 8:43 “Why do you not know what I say? Because you are unable to hear My Word. Joh 8:44 “You are of your father the devil (Slanderer), and the desires of your father you wish to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has not stood in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks of his own, for he is a liar and the father of it.
Joh 10:27 “My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.
1Jn 4:6 We are of Elohim – the one knowing Elohim hears us. He who is not of Elohim does not hear us. By this we know the Spirit of the Truth and the spirit of the delusion.
Jer 31:33 “For this is the covenant I shall make with the house of Yisra’ěl after those days, declares YHWH: I shall put My Torah [Law] in their inward parts, and write it on their hearts. And I shall be their Elohim, and they shall be My people. Jer 31:34 “And no longer shall they teach, each one his neighbour, and each one his brother, saying, ‘Know YHWH,’ for they shall all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them,” declares YHWH. “For I shall forgive their crookedness, and remember their sin no more.”
- Karaites agree with other Jews that Christians are idolators for saying Christ is God, and they agree with Islam that he was a Prophet that got misinterpreted/ corrupted. But the claim that he is divine is why Christ was killed. It would be idolatry, if Christ was a liar and did not actually come from God. Anti-Christ includes all who deny Christ, even if they are well-meaning.
In my understanding, it is not a contradiction of other scriptures. There is the Eternal Father, or the "Alfather," who can only exist outside of all creation, physical or 'spiritual,' and then his "first-born" creation, was a "reflection," equal in worshipfulness, known as "the Word," perhaps in reference to being the perfect medium between God and his subsequent creations. Obviously an eternal creator-being could not be placed within the body of a mortal man, to experience life as we would, but a medium, that had the reflected character & wisdom of God, could be- but he is not an "angel" or "archangel" like other sects claim, or else he would have acted as they do when humans try to worship then (inform them that it's a grave sin).
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with Elohim, and the Word was Elohim. Joh 1:2 He was in the beginning with Elohim. Joh 1:3 All came to be through Him, and without Him not even one came to be that came to be.
(Notice: There is no mention of any Goddess or third 'holy spirit figure.' It is not a trinity. "Split wood, I am there.")
In the beginning of the Bible God references his own first-born son, his medium, in what is called "The First Promise of the Messiah"-
Gen 3:15 “And I put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her Seed. He shall crush your head, and you shall crush His heel.”
So it is at this point, in the beginning, where he realises that he must 'sacrifice' his firstborn son, who is equal to him in worshipfulness as God, by putting him in that risky situation. So what was the reason for this?
Animal Sacrifices demanded by God were for atonement of sins. They were not like a Baal blood sacrifice, but instead, a reminder of the heavy costs of sinning, and the necessity to repent of sin (completely, not just apologise).
So the Firstborn's sacrifice atones the first sin, thus atoning all subsequent sins- conditionally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B3kgiLxybY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfCSMqxQclU
In practical terms, God saw that not even Adam & Eve trusted him, and they were given everything except hardship & struggle. The sole reason for this was because God was above them in hierarchy, he was all-powerful, and they did not trust the ambiguity that came with not being on the 'same footing'. They wanted EQUALITY with an Eternal God, and that is what the 'serpent' provided with his lie. The only way for God to prove that he genuinely cared & was trustworthy was to physically put his son/ medium into the shoes of the other side, and it was inherently a sacrifice because of the inevitable risks/ dangers balanced against God's own self-inflicted promises/ rules/ honour, he has to keep his word and prove every account.
(post is archived)