No, you refuse to have an actual discussion like an adult. You are banking on the theory (and it is a theory) that Matthew and Mark were written in Aramaic originally. Fine. However, there is no question that Luke, Acts, and John were written in Greek. Luke was a Greek convert to Christianity and the Tradition says that his books were primarily interviews with the Virgin Mary. John wrote his books in Greek because "Logos" ("Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος.) Is notan Aramaic word, nor is there a direct translation for that word in any other language. The English uses "Word" instead of "Logos", but that doesn't come close to the meaning of the term Logos. So even if there were two books written in Aramaic, it wouldn't make a difference unless you're mistranslating to make it out of sync with the rest of the NT, not to mention the letters which came after like Clement's letter to the Corinthians or the epistles of Ignatius of Antioch orthe writings of Justin Martyr, etc...which confirm the Synoptic Gospels.