Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

834

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Jewspiracy is a HIDDEN SUB. I'm not looking to HIDE this information, but let others see it that don't go to such HIDDEN SUB as Jewspiracy.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Jewspiracy is a HIDDEN SUB.

lol There's no such thing as hidden subs. This isn't faggit here.

Click poal logo and you'll understand why.

Also unlike user subs, default ones are managed by designated mods and admins. So submitting unrelated/off-topic posts in default subs will get them moved. Check sidebar.

[–] • 0 pt

Really? Strange how the sub Jewspiracy and Niggers does not come up in the subverse list if a visitor comes on. That's "HIDDEN".

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

It's so strange that it's bogus. The NT authors wrote in Greek to a Greek audience. Get over it! Jesus is Lord!

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Absolutely PROVEN WRONG by numerous christian scholars as well as the FREE BOOK ... get over it, pagan.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

numerous

LOL. Counting noses? You must be a scientist!

[–] • 0 pt

I suppose you're foolish enough to think "numerous" mean standard opinion in the West??

But, it is standard opinion in the East that the original was Aramaic, and they are PROVEN RIGHT by the variations in the Greek. Period.

[–] • 0 pt

That sounds like something the devil would say if he didn't want anybody to believe the Bible.

[–] • 0 pt

This. This argument ultimately leads back to, "the church was off base within a handful of years of its founding, which means that God is so weak that he couldn't even keep His church for a single generation, so give up on all of it.

Fuck that. My God is strong, His church has been under His protection for 2000 years, and a few pissant heretics in high positions don't change that.

[–] • -1 pt (edited )

Fine.

But "the church" shouldn't go around and claim that the devil is the "great deceiver" and then turn right around and make the claim that "their church has the real answers" because isn't that EXACTLY the claim that the devil would make because he's the "great deceiver"?

Kinda of circular logic, isn't it?

[–] • -1 pt

In their defense most of their existence was before the printing press, so they kind of had to adopt policy of take our word for it let us interpret the Bible for you. They couldn't exactly give the average illiterate peasant access to a rare handwritten, handpainted animal vellum book that cost the equivalent of $100,000 today to make.

[–] • -1 pt

The Catholic Church makes the claim because Jesus founded a Church on Peter (Matt 16:18), which persists today. The interpretation of Scripture in the Church is never down to what one man has to say, but is rather based on the whole of Tradition received through the Apostles and carried forth by the Church Fathers.

The Bible is a liturgical document and cannot be separated from Tradition any more than you could separate say, stereo instructions from the actual physical device. Sola Scriptura is a heresy because without that interpretive tradition, all one is left with is a series of documents without historical or spiritual reference. Hence why everything from the Catholic and Orthodox Churches to (((Joel Osteen))) cannot be considered "Christian", because there is no single voice.

Granted, even within the Catholic Church there is debate on certain interpretations of some passages, but the overall message is one of persistant belief in the same thing for millenia (namely that one must have the sacraments to be saved).

[–] • -1 pt (edited )

Rev 11:7  And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.

Rev 13:7  And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. 

The TRUE faith was "OVERCOME", says so two times right there.

Act 20:29  For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. 

See that FOOL! He even TOLD YOU WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE IT HAPPENED and you're too arrogant to admit it. Cause you got your SOLAR CULT FILTH and that's all that matters, right?

It's YOUR CHURCH that overcame the remnant and MURDERED them, IDIOT!

You worship SATAN in disguise.

[–] • 0 pt

Get thee behind me.

[–] • -1 pt

Well, HERE's the religion HE gave you:

2Th 2:11  And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:  2Th 2:12  That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

See, because you're a blasphemous reprobate that hate HIS LAWS and your promoting lies to justify your paganism, HE CURSED YOU with a false system.

AND THE BIBLE SAYS SO. So, by 95 a.d. the Apocalypse is written and in chapters 2 and 3 tells you 5 of the 7 churches were worthy of death ALREADY. Long before the paganism of ROME was added.

BUT, no matter, you're dumb enough to think the "narrow way" "few find" is the LARGEST RELIGION IN THE WORLD WITH NEARLY 3 BILLION ADHERENTS, christianity. Go ahead. See, it is YOU that follow that "working of Satan", 2 Thes. 2, have the "man of sin" sitting in your "temple" and are indeed damned. Too arrogant to even read a post on a subverse.

[–] • 0 pt

I just made a statement, YOU'RE the one who called me a "blasphemous reprobate" for doing so, then people like YOU wonder why more people don't follow the christian faith.

Fortunately, I AM a Christian. No thanks to name calling so-called "believers" like you.

[–] • 0 pt

Ever heard the terms "whited wall", "fox", "of your father the devil", "vipers" ... Messiah said those. I'm in good company. You JUDGMENTAL blasphemer.

[–] • 0 pt

Praise Jesus!, amen?

they that hate me love death

[–] • -1 pt

ANOTHER shall come in his OWN NAME, "jesus", him you will receive, as you reject the True Messiah.

[–] • 0 pt

you missed the part where Jesus said ;

I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not:...

[–] • 0 pt

Oh, I don't miss it, YOU DO ...

YAH WEH YAH SHUA

Psa 68:4  Sing unto Yahweh, sing praises to his name: extol him that rideth upon the heavens by his name YAH, and rejoice before him.

BUT YOU "DENY" HIS NAME, opting for the hellenized replacement of that jew sorcerer: Act 13:6  And when they had gone through the isle unto Paphos, they found a certain sorcerer, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Bar jesus:  Act 13:7  Which was with the deputy of the country, Sergius Paulus, a prudent man; who called for Barnabas and Saul, and desired to hear the word of God.  Act 13:8  But Elymas the sorcerer (for so is his name by interpretation) withstood them, seeking to turn away the deputy from the faith. 

ELYMAS means "my god is Zeus" ... and Elymas is the translation of the name Jesus. https://yliyahmessagetime.wordpress.com/2020/08/25/the-man-of-sin-already-sits-in-the-temple/ https://yliyahmessagetime.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/elymas-is-jesus-1.pdf

[–] • 0 pt

This was written by a jew faggot with no understanding of history. Judea had been completely hellenized 400 years before Christ. Everyone spoke Greek. Jesus predicated in Greek. The day to day administration and market language was Greek.

Saying the NT was written in Aramaic and Jesus predicated in Aramaic is like saying that a Navajo indian went up and down the East coast of the US in 2021, predicated in Navajo, and managed to draw large crowds and destabalize the power structure in the region.

It's faggot talk for faggot listeners without a brain for critical thought.

It's even crazier than that. Read the book "Hebrew is Greek" if you want to go down the rabbit hole further. The real ancient hebrews were Eastern Greeks who mingled in Asia Minor with the Eastern religions and thoughts, which is why they were the first Westerners who practiced mono-theism.

[–] • 0 pt

Act 1:19 And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jerusalem; insomuch as that field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.

Vincent’s Word Studies, available on many Bible software programs, tells us: “Akeldamach. The word is Aramaic, the language then spoken in Palestine.“

Robertson’s Word Pictures tells us: “Language (dialektōi). Not a dialect of the Greek, but a different language, the Aramaic.“

The position of the Assyrian Church of the East is that the Syriac Peshitta used in that church, is the original of the New Testament. For instance, the patriarch Shimun XXI Eshai declared: “With reference to… the originality of the Peshitta text, as the Patriarch and Head of the Holy Apostolic and Catholic Church of the East, we wish to state, that the Church of the East received the scriptures from the hands of the blessed Apostles themselves in the Aramaic original, the language spoken by our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, and that the Peshitta is the text of the Church of the East which has come down from the Biblical times without any change or revision.” (April 5, 1957)

We find this fact in the Jerusalem Bible of 1966:

“An anonymous editor, Matthew Greek, decided to rewrite the first Aramaic gospel, which was known to him in one of its Greek translations. This he filled out and made more detailed, using for his narrative parts of the work of Mark his predecessor, to which he added one thing of importance, i.e. the two chapters of the infancy narrative.“

We see here the Jerusalem Bible declaring Matthew was originally in Aramaic, that the two chapters of the infancy narrative are not original to the Aramaic, and that Matthew is but the ‘first’ of other Aramaic gospels.

I could post a thousand more, but YOU DON'T CARE. You're stuck in your corruption, so enjoy.

[–] • 0 pt

Matthew 27:46

About the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?” which means, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?”

https://biblehub.com/matthew/27-46.htm

Funny how the NT uses Aramaic words and then translates them in the text for you for the scant times Jesus spoke Aramaic in public.

Almost like it was written in Greek, for Greek speakers.

[–] • 0 pt

LOL! Almost like an Edomite Jew wanted to rub it in your face they CHANGED THE ORIGINAL TEXT, you mean.

DAMN FOOL! Already pointed out other passages where it is KNOWN that they did that.

Read the book lazy nigger.

AND ... I already explained, the Peshitta IS NOT THE ORIGINAL ARAMAIC/HEBREW SOURCE of the New testament. But even it does NOT AGREE with the wording of the passage YOU just gave.

[–] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Oh no, the Edomite jew is back playing games.

[–] • 0 pt

No, you refuse to have an actual discussion like an adult.

You are banking on the theory (and it is a theory) that Matthew and Mark were written in Aramaic originally. Fine. However, there is no question that Luke, Acts, and John were written in Greek. Luke was a Greek convert to Christianity and the Tradition says that his books were primarily interviews with the Virgin Mary. John wrote his books in Greek because "Logos" ("Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος.) Is notan Aramaic word, nor is there a direct translation for that word in any other language. The English uses "Word" instead of "Logos", but that doesn't come close to the meaning of the term Logos.

So even if there were two books written in Aramaic, it wouldn't make a difference unless you're mistranslating to make it out of sync with the rest of the NT, not to mention the letters which came after like Clement's letter to the Corinthians or the epistles of Ignatius of Antioch orthe writings of Justin Martyr, etc...which confirm the Synoptic Gospels.

[–] • -1 pt

"two books". LOL!

Read the book IGNORANT one.

[–] • -1 pt

I've looked over this a bit, comparing some passages. I find it strange that it keeps Jesus' name as Yeshua, yet hellenizes God's name to Jehovah.

Also Revelation 9:11 the names are completely different. And there is a King over them, the Angel of The Abyss, whose name in Hebrew is Avadu, and in Aramaic his name is Shara.

[–] • 0 pt

And Jehovah is even a bastardization unto itself.

[–] • -1 pt (edited )

That video, while predominently accurate, I suggest deliberately misses the real problem and places doubt in reality.

  1. "Jehovah" is an Edomite Chazar "jew" attempt to deliberately hide the tetragrammaton pronuncition which they encouraged all translators use under the pretense that the name was too "holy" for the commoner to be tossing around, and thereby blaspheme it. Though it was a sin to hide it. It was NOT THE FIRST TIME ATTEMPTS TO HIDE THE NAME HAVE TAKEN PLACE. The entire El, Elyon and Elohim terminology are additions and alterations.

  2. It was NOT always looked upon as wrong to pronounce the tetragrammaton.

  3. Before vowel points were added around 600 a.d. the Hebrew DID HAVE VOWELS. The Yod, He and Waw served as both consnants and vowels. This why Josephus says the high priest mitre had the tetragrammaton on in the "FOUR VOWELS".

READ SECTION 1

https://files.catbox.moe/flsly9.jpg https://files.catbox.moe/vdc2w3.jpg

[–] • 0 pt

What I've found is few of the actual 'scholars' are emphatic in variations. They have a job to hold down and don't care to make a scene. Someone once told them it's a non issue so it doesn't matter, and they go with it. However, numerous passages focus on emphasis of names, and one of the main manifestations of 'hellenization' is characters being given names common to the Grecian mythos or corruptions from other sources. "Christos" was worshipped as a sun deity in Egypt for a thousand years before 1 A.D. The "wolves" Paul warned of wanted to DEVOUR the Flock, and they did by hellenization and paganization. Rev. 3 gives you Philadelphia not DENYING the name of the Messiah Yahshua, and that suggests the others had done so. Denied the true name for what?? "Christos Iesous"? The very mark of the beast is a name related issue ... "christ", as even christian scholars point out. Yahshua warned of a name issue, John 5:43. John 1:41 is arrogantly mocking of a name change by one of the Greek translators which were Edomite jews deliberately altering the texts. John never wrote the end of that passage, "which is, being interpreted, the Christ", and Andrew never said that. It's added. The same is true likely in the Rev. 9:11 passage, the Grecian descriptor is ADDED by a pagan Greek translator. Messiah's own name is prophesied to Moses, hence the name change for Hoshea to Yahshua ... which SAME NAME was revealed to Mary (Mariam) by the angyl. Yet some think it doesn't matter what that name was that is so revealed from on high! Like it doesn't matter. That name change Moses gave to Hoshea is preserved on the Amarna tablets. So the "Yeshua" is also a corruption, though commonly used. The vowel points being added around 600 A.D. did NOT help anything, but HID a lot. It appears such was common in various translations. "Jehovah", and the earlier "Yehovah" or "Iehovah", is a well known "JEWISH" (chazar edomite mongrels claiming to be "jews") inspired replacement designed to hide the more accurate pronunciation. A cross of vowel points from Adonai being mixed with the tetragrammaton.

[–] • 0 pt

I had found a story I read a while back that I had found interesting. I'm claiming it as true, but it is a good read. When the author gets to Jeshu he makes a statement of how he becamed named Jesus to identify him with Zeus.

http://saturndeathcult.com/the-sturn-death-cult-part-1/

[–] • 0 pt

Yes. The Saturn cult, think "Saturnsday" Saturday, is but a part of the Solar Cult. The solar cult is just a cover story for the sex cult. It all goes back to the "original sin", Eve losing her virginity to a lower beast of the Field. Part of the genetic war to destroy the remnant. Hence, Satan worship is what the world does ... including all of Islam, Judaism and Christianity. The original faith of the original Bible is Yahwehism, the worship of Yahweh.

Saturnsday is not part of the Bible calendar. Edomite jews adopted it in 359-360 a.d., i.e. the seventh day of the Roman SOLAR calendar. The Bible Sabbath is set by the moon phases. https://yliyahmessagetime.wordpress.com/2017/06/25/359-360-a-d-modern-claimed-jews-changed-their-sabbath-day-from-yahwehs-seventh-day-to-romes-dont-follow-such-perverted-abominations/

Yes, you will find groups claiming Yahweh is Satan and blah blah blah, but not gonna get into why that isn't so, other than to say, Yahweh uses Satan to do a hell of a lot of cursing to the majority ... including using religion to achieve a prophetic result Yahweh wants. Christianity is just one of many.