WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

861

If you're not aware of the esther story, apparently she, a consort who becomes queen to the persian king whilst keeping her jewish identity secret, manages to convince the king not to go ahead with a 'genocidal pogrom' against the jews in persia.

apparently an extraordinarily similar story happens again in the talmud (which is full with obviously fake stories that read like fables) in the roman empire during domitian's reign:

"some scholars connect domitilla with a character in jewish tradition, a roman matron in the talmud (avodah zarah 10b) and deuteronomy rabbah 2.25. when the emperor had decreed that in 30 days the senate would confirm an edict to kill all jews and christians in the roman empire, the roman matron convinced her husband to stand up for the jews. in that tradition, flavius clemens converted to judaism after having contact with the great sage rabbi akiva."

obviously this story is a copy and made up and there was no 30 days before the upcoming holocaust. whilst they paint themselves as the victim of genocide (sound familiar?), a further look into the historical account, provided by romans who thankfully are honest men and don't lie unlike the rat jews, shows the true picture, that jews were trying to infiltrate the court by exploiting a degenerate whose very son was going to become the heir, but were found out:

"cassius dio (c. 155–235) reports in his roman history: "domitian slew, along with many others, flavius clemens the consul, although he was a cousin and married to flavia domitilla, who was also a relative of the emperor's. the charge brought against them both was that of sacrilege or godlessness (ancient greek ἀθεότης), a charge on which many others who drifted into jewish ways were condemned. some of these were put to death, and the rest were at least deprived of their property. domitilla was merely banished to pandateria."6

suetonius writes: "finally he put to death his own cousin flavius clemens, suddenly and on a very slight suspicion, almost before the end of his consulship; and yet flavius was a man of most contemptible laziness and domitian had besides openly named his sons, who were then very young, as his successors, changing their former names and calling the one vespasian and the other domitian. and it was by this deed in particular that he hastened his own destruction."

so after finding this out, did domitian go ahead with the planned holocaust, now that he had even more motivation to do so? no. instead, it was he who was assasinated by the jews:

"suetonius says that one of those involved in the assassination of domitian on 18 september 96 was domitilla's steward stephanus."

this story is almost a mini repeat of ww2. finding out jews are infiltrating his society, he cracks down on them a bit. jews make out as if they're being genocided whilst they work on murdering the one who stands in the way of their attempts to take over.

If you're not aware of the esther story, apparently she, a consort who becomes queen to the persian king whilst keeping her jewish identity secret, manages to convince the king not to go ahead with a 'genocidal pogrom' against the jews in persia. apparently an extraordinarily similar story happens again in the talmud (which is full with obviously fake stories that read like fables) in the roman empire during domitian's reign: "some scholars connect domitilla with a character in jewish tradition, a roman matron in the talmud (avodah zarah 10b) and deuteronomy rabbah 2.25. when the emperor had decreed that in 30 days the senate would confirm an edict to kill all jews and christians in the roman empire, the roman matron convinced her husband to stand up for the jews. in that tradition, flavius clemens converted to judaism after having contact with the great sage rabbi akiva." obviously this story is a copy and made up and there was no 30 days before the upcoming holocaust. whilst they paint themselves as the victim of genocide (sound familiar?), a further look into the historical account, provided by romans who thankfully are honest men and don't lie unlike the rat jews, shows the true picture, that jews were trying to infiltrate the court by exploiting a degenerate whose very son was going to become the heir, but were found out: "cassius dio (c. 155–235) reports in his roman history: "domitian slew, along with many others, flavius clemens the consul, although he was a cousin and married to flavia domitilla, who was also a relative of the emperor's. the charge brought against them both was that of sacrilege or godlessness (ancient greek ἀθεότης), a charge on which many others who drifted into jewish ways were condemned. some of these were put to death, and the rest were at least deprived of their property. domitilla was merely banished to pandateria."6 suetonius writes: "finally he put to death his own cousin flavius clemens, suddenly and on a very slight suspicion, almost before the end of his consulship; and yet flavius was a man of most contemptible laziness and domitian had besides openly named his sons, who were then very young, as his successors, changing their former names and calling the one vespasian and the other domitian. and it was by this deed in particular that he hastened his own destruction." so after finding this out, did domitian go ahead with the planned holocaust, now that he had even more motivation to do so? no. instead, it was he who was assasinated by the jews: "suetonius says that one of those involved in the assassination of domitian on 18 september 96 was domitilla's steward stephanus." this story is almost a mini repeat of ww2. finding out jews are infiltrating his society, he cracks down on them a bit. jews make out as if they're being genocided whilst they work on murdering the one who stands in the way of their attempts to take over.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

oh i should probably add the final lesson of this story:

whilst history, and jews, will say that Domitian was killed because of his cruelty etc. in reality he was actually killed because instead of executing Domitilla, he simply exiled her. he lost because he wasn't cruel enough. this same story plays out with the Tsar, who exiled lenin and trotsky instead of executing them, then gets killed by them, and then they paint him as the one who was 'cruel ruler' when his lack of cruelty was the reason he lost.

[–] 0 pt

Excellent post and analysis. Thanks for the effort you put into this.

Again and again, we are forced to re-learn this lesson.