Lol why are some of the x-axes on a scale of 100+ years while others are on a scale of 10 years? Also why doesn’t whoever made this know what “death rate” means? What does the polio graph look like if it shows 100 years of deaths leading up to the vaccine instead of 7? Why are some of the deadliest diseases just left out of the analysis? Whooping cough/measles/etc aren’t generally feared because of their fatality rate
Fuck off. Maybe because there is not sold data for more years. But the proof is in the graph, more years are not necessary. It's questionable as fuck you would ask that, as it's extremely obvious. As for a disease's mortality: again, not the point. The point is that (((vaccines))) don't do a thing but rather simple sanitary conditions do.
This should be proof enough for any critical thinker to realize this jackoff (Anticlutch) is a paid pharma shill, recently graduated from JIDF.
His obvious reason for being here is to make those here critical of vaccines look stupid by affiliation.
Unless you’re retarded, you should be able to understand that anyone can zoom into a tiny section of a graph to change its overall appearance. You think there’s solid info about the deaths from measles for 120 years but we only have 10 years of info about POLIO? The deaths from polio in 1950 could be a tiny spike in the scheme of 100 years, but since it’s zoomed into a ten year scale, that tiny spike looks huge.
Please tell me you’re not stupid enough to not be able to understand that
Shocking, downvotes without responding, his go-to when presented with actual facts and well thought-out ideas. Incapable of thinking for himself, or coming up with a rebuttal, or even simply admitting that he might be wrong, downvoting without responding somehow makes him feel like he’s won the argument.
Literal circumcised cock sucking faggot, please kill yourself with the rest of the trannies
(post is archived)