having some experience in the entertainment industry, I’m familiar with sites just like this one. You take all of the talent sites in the world and there’s probably 10 million people signed up with profiles. And those are just the actors, not the sound, tech, lighting, SFX, etc. Most of them never go anywhere. Just because these people actually did find a way to turn their attention seeking into a career, what makes this nefarious? I’m not saying it isn’t nefarious. I’m genuinely asking. What do we know about this agency? It’s been described as “shady” but what do we specifically know that makes it shady or gives any kind of meaning whatsoever to the fact that people who try to be entertainers eventually went into politics for the attention they seek? Is the implication that the deep state recruited these people from their profiles to become controlled opposition? I know a lot of failed actors who became writers or producers or went into journalism or politics, they became news anchors, meteorologists, standup comics, because their acting or entertainment career never went anywhere. Is it really all that surprising that some of them could become politicians and pundits? Especially with Twitter raising their profile without the outside help of a studio or a project like a movie or a TV show. I mean someone like Candace Owens could just go on Twitter and say whatever the hell she wants to get attention and it might work for her. And her failed entertainment career becomes a successful career in telling people what they want to hear. I’m not sure what it has to do with the fact that they have a profile up on the website. Again, not trying to be argumentative, I’m really just missing the context here. Is there also some nefarious conspiracy to recruit failed actors to become meteorologists? Just because you can draw a line from one thing to another doesn’t give it significance on its own. Was this agency caught in some scandal or something? I mean, aside from the fact it was owned by kikes.