It does. But diversity isn't necessarily good. It's the propaganda which baselessly claims diversity is good and beneficial in spite of all evidence to the contrary.

Combine a horse and a donkey and you get a mule. You created diversity. But in doing so the horse's and donkey's genetics are lost. The result is an infertile mule which is only good as a mindless work animal. They can easily move bigger loads over longer periods of time than horses or donkeys. But they loose everything which is amazing about horses and donkeys and are generally considered dumber than their parents.

This is precisely the goal of diversity for whites. Too dumb to rebel but smart enough to maintain society. While permanently destroying everything which might rise up in the future.

Another example of diversity is black and white offspring are genetically incompatible and therefore are excluded from reception of organs from either race. Again, diversity, but certainly not beneficial.

You are correct.

Remember: Their viewpoints rely on a carefully constructed denial of reality to a far greater extent than any of the counterpoints they seek to supplant.

Hybrids are a new strain.

There is something called heterosis (or Hybrid Vigor), that these people apply erroneously to miscegenation. Human studies don't back this up.

Appart from studies, life in general show that Japanese are some of the healthiest people on Earth and they don't have heterosis to the same degree that hispanics do.

I never understood it either. Why on earth would I want to give race specific defects like low iq or high blood pressure from another race to my child? If we’re all brown Mullato spic mutts with black hair, brown eyes, do people genuinely think things will get better, safer? Look at the black hoods where you couldn’t tell one from another and we know how much violence and depravity is there and will always be there.