The problem with falsehoods is that when "your" entire narrative revolves around them, and you get into a real debate... You open yourself to defeat, to getting your ass handed to you, to ridicule, rendering everything you've said whether true or not, as lunacies/yet another "racist" "antisemitic" "trope". That's pretty sad you have to admit, especially since that could have been easily avoided with a little more intellectual rigour. Now one can always pretend that he doesn't mind being turned into a joke, we both know it's false. And no, we aren't on the same playing field as leftists are, we don't have the upper hand when it comes to public debates and control of the institutions, plural, so... Just because leftists give themselves a pass for all sorts of falsehoods doesn't mean it's okay for us to do the same... Now interestingly enough, it seems that even (some) leftists are now realizing that's it's not that a great idea to run on falsehoods https://dailystormer.su/fat-black-woman-creator-of-1619-project-accepts-teaching-job-at-university-refuses-to-show-up-until-she-gets-tenure >>The 1619 Project is facing a lot of heat, given that aside from the extremist politics it represents, it is also filled with factual inaccuracies. Some leftists are feeling that this threatens the integrity of their anti-white agenda, and that their anti-white materials should be more based on ideology, instead of just making up fake historical facts.