I don't know why the right doesn't accept that no one is going to be correct all of the time. Even if there were genuine people who were able to make it through the censors, they'd end up wrong on a few points after a while.

It's not just "being wrong some of the time," it's refusing to acknowledge one of the largest issues in world politics for the last 100 years. Israel has been driving much of the violence in the world since its inception and a refusal to criticize them is a perfect litmus test for whether or not a person is legitimately concerned about what's going on, or whether they're here to disrupt criticism of the home country.

I think it's because people have a very emotional, bi-polar view of others and society that comes from being infantalized and immature (and possibly actually retarded). Like a kid, they cannot perceive others as whole beings that have good and bad attributes, but judge others on a scale of god or bad altogether. So when someone does something bad, they will be a "bad person" until that same someone does something good, at which point they become again a "good person". But this is always interpreted through the eyes of the immature person in that, the good or bad actions are defined by the observer themselves, based on how it affects them and not necessarily by some objective moral standard. Like Jordan Petersen...we can argue that the overall contribution of JP might be positive, but because he has slighted some morons for not thinking exactly like them, then he becomes a bad person and all he contains is to be disregarded. It's like kids in a schoolyard. i suppose i could have said "because people are retarded" but i have thought about this question myself, having seen it in my own life. People judge not based on how a man cares for his family or his wife and community. People judge a man by how he caters to their own personal emotions. You could be a pedo and been seen positively as long as you shake hands and kiss people's asses and the opposite is true. A virtuous person can and most often is, perceived as a bad man because he does not appear to be nice or exactly like the observer thinks they should be. Basically people are retards and their emotions feel betrayed when others don't repeat their own thoughts back to them. We can see a version of this - albeit somewhat opposite - in Trump, who can do no wrong because he says what people think, even if he actually works against their interests. And you get hate for a guy like JP when he is actually working in your interests, such as the case with bill c-16.

edit: Also, i would add that glowies will play this up very nicely in "condemning" those voices that are telling you things they don;t want you to hear. They know a good chunk of people will disregard everything Fuentes says, just because he is catholic. Or Cerno because he has shady ties or even Assange because, what again?Jews calling others jews on here or 4chan for example.. knowing that's all it takes to poison a perfectly good well for the mass of bi-polar retards.

"don't throw the baby out with the bathwater."