Yeah, pretty obvious. I sometimes listen to Gavin McInnis. He's pretty funny and non pc. Will make fun of almost anyone, but will shit his pants when anyone mentions the Jews.
I don't know why the right doesn't accept that no one is going to be correct all of the time. Even if there were genuine people who were able to make it through the censors, they'd end up wrong on a few points after a while.
When someone makes a good point--amplify it. When they start saying something incorrect call them out. Just because someone make a good point once doesn't mean you need to ever support them again.
Jordan Peterson did a good job a publicizing and condemning C16. Then he started talking stupid stuff about individualism. It's okay to use and amplify his good points while simultaneously condemning him for his bad ones. Even people like Alex Jones and Jimmy Dore have valid points that should be amplified by us. That doesn't mean you support them or even support half of what they say.
I'd love to be able to go to a news source like OANN or a twitter feed like Cerno and just trust what their saying. That's not going to happen. We're not going to have a single useful voice that makes it though all the censors. Amplifying good takes while simultaneous saying you don't trust the source is how you take the power away from the controlled opposition.
I don't know why the right doesn't accept that no one is going to be correct all of the time. Even if there were genuine people who were able to make it through the censors, they'd end up wrong on a few points after a while.
It's not just "being wrong some of the time," it's refusing to acknowledge one of the largest issues in world politics for the last 100 years. Israel has been driving much of the violence in the world since its inception and a refusal to criticize them is a perfect litmus test for whether or not a person is legitimately concerned about what's going on, or whether they're here to disrupt criticism of the home country.
The problem is an talk of the (((real problem))) gets you shut down by the censors. Even people like Mike Enoch who seems to criticize jews all the time can't really be trusted. Just because someone like Jordan Peterson absolute won't touch the jewish issue, doesn't mean his arguments and videos can't be used to shut down some of the tranny crap that is being pushed so hard by the media.
The problem is one of diversion, though. Sources compromised in this way are careful to deflect blame from where it belongs. People who put stock in those sources find themselves ill-informed about the causal factors of the very things about which they are concerned, and for which they are turning to others for answers.
Tranny crap is just a symptom of the bigger problem. Treat the symptoms all you want, the disease is still there.
I think it's because people have a very emotional, bi-polar view of others and society that comes from being infantalized and immature (and possibly actually retarded). Like a kid, they cannot perceive others as whole beings that have good and bad attributes, but judge others on a scale of god or bad altogether. So when someone does something bad, they will be a "bad person" until that same someone does something good, at which point they become again a "good person". But this is always interpreted through the eyes of the immature person in that, the good or bad actions are defined by the observer themselves, based on how it affects them and not necessarily by some objective moral standard. Like Jordan Petersen...we can argue that the overall contribution of JP might be positive, but because he has slighted some morons for not thinking exactly like them, then he becomes a bad person and all he contains is to be disregarded. It's like kids in a schoolyard. i suppose i could have said "because people are retarded" but i have thought about this question myself, having seen it in my own life. People judge not based on how a man cares for his family or his wife and community. People judge a man by how he caters to their own personal emotions. You could be a pedo and been seen positively as long as you shake hands and kiss people's asses and the opposite is true. A virtuous person can and most often is, perceived as a bad man because he does not appear to be nice or exactly like the observer thinks they should be. Basically people are retards and their emotions feel betrayed when others don't repeat their own thoughts back to them. We can see a version of this - albeit somewhat opposite - in Trump, who can do no wrong because he says what people think, even if he actually works against their interests. And you get hate for a guy like JP when he is actually working in your interests, such as the case with bill c-16.
edit: Also, i would add that glowies will play this up very nicely in "condemning" those voices that are telling you things they don;t want you to hear. They know a good chunk of people will disregard everything Fuentes says, just because he is catholic. Or Cerno because he has shady ties or even Assange because, what again?Jews calling others jews on here or 4chan for example.. knowing that's all it takes to poison a perfectly good well for the mass of bi-polar retards.
"don't throw the baby out with the bathwater."
Even if they're not in on it, they'll be murdered if they push against certain groups inside of Israel.
This is why we need to build up ourselves along side local networks and services to get on with our life as the world economies experience the "great reset."
This is true.
Says Patrick while he stands in front of a CPAC picture for his profile logo...
The evidence he offers? None. like asking somebody to criticize the pope and saying "ah ha! You won't because you're bought and paid for by x"
https://www.bollyn.com/the-mass-media-the-9-11-cover-up:
"why would a Hollywood movie producer spend more time in Tel Aviv, where no movies are being made, than in Hollywood? Was the Israeli chemical magnate Arnon Milchan the author of the plotline for The Lone Gunmen pilot episode in which a passenger airplane was remotely hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center?
In Milchan's highly-controversial film JFK (1991), directed by Oliver Stone, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy is ascribed to conspirators within the U.S. military-industrial complex. Whose idea was this? Why is Arnon Milchan's own connection with Itzhak Rabin, who was in Dallas on the day Kennedy was shot, not an issue here?"
"I'M AN AGENT" ... "My idea of a good profile is no profile," Milchan told Bardach....Milchan also funds Christian Zionist movements. Milchan has reportedly contributed significantly to the Christian Coalition, an organization started by the Reverend Pat Robertson, a staunch supporter of Israel... "I'll say it in my own words," Milchan told Bardach. "I love Israel, and any way I can help Israel, I will. I'll do it again and again."
Sources & Recommended Reading
Bardach, Ann Louise, "The Last Tycoon" Los Angeles Magazine, April 2000 http://www.bardachreports.com/articles/oa_20000400.html
Bollyn, Christopher, "Intel Expert Says 9/11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show" December 2001
Bollyn, "9/11: What Did Rupert Murdoch Know?" October 3, 2003
Bollyn, "Mossad - The Israeli Connection To 9/11" April 14, 2005
Bollyn, "Some Survivors Say Bombs Exploded in WTC" September 2001
Bollyn, "'Series of Explosions' in WTC - BBC" June 28, 2002
Bollyn, "9/11 Mossad Agents Admit Mission: 'Our Purpose Was to Document the Event'" June 28, 2002
Bollyn, "Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee? The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11" August 24, 2006
Bollyn, "The Great Game: The War For Caspian Oil And Gas" October 14, 2001
Lima, Paolo, "Five men detained as suspected conspirators," Bergen Record, September 12, 2001 http://web.archive.org/web.../2bombvan200109125.htm
McArthur, Shirl, "A Conservative Estimate of Total Direct U.S. Aid to Israel: $108 Billion" Washington Report, July 2006 http://www.wrmea.com/archives/July_2006/0607016.html
Washington Post, "Computer Expert Used Firm to Feed Israel Technology" October 31, 1986
Washington Post, "L.A. Man Indicted in Export of Potential Nuclear Bomb Component to Israel" by John M. Goshko, May 17, 1985
Washington Post, "U.S. Asks to Inspect Israeli Atom Sites To Verify Use of Restricted Device" by John M. Goshko, May 15, 1985
Washington Post, "Israel Got U.S.-Made Devices" by John M. Goshko, May 14, 1985
Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, "Israeli Nuclear Program Pioneered by Shimon Peres," The Risk Report, Volume 2 Number 4, July-August 1996 http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/israel/Israel-nuclear-peres.html
Same pattern as the hitler deal
(post is archived)