> sorry if i'm over-critical today. Not at all, brother. I agree with your points and how you present them. I've choked through a ton of agitating perspectives and it's an acquired thing. I think this guy is as much a performance artist as he is a realist. I'll say this, there are several layers to the onion and one must pass through few layers at a time without losing sense. When you run the logical scenarios on all the angles it's almost like I could have made the same video myself, and with the same delivery, if talking to a friend for a couple hours. It'd be nice if it was 5 min as well ... but I choked through it anyway and he uses the layered argument structure which is going over a similar point over and over again each pass adding to the structure of what he's saying. Often, one can't digest the big flow chart any other way. There are bad sides to this type of argument structure as well, as often there is no argument but it's rehashed so many times one may not see there is no argument and become brainwashed in a sense. I'll say this, he did a fantastic "Whoaaah man!" type impression of what might be going through JP's head and I was floored because I had the same conversation with someone 2 months ago about that same incident. This guy knows the mystic techniques for sure.