A jury convicted a man of rape whose accusers had no evidence other than their testimony and also admitted to having consentual sex before and after the alleged rape.
They should have convicted Weinstein for making bad movies with disgusting jewish social engineering in them. Or being a John who bought prostitutes with nice career opportunities. Not rape.
A jury convicted a man of rape whose accusers had no evidence other than their testimony and also admitted to having consentual sex before and after the alleged rape.
They should have convicted Weinstein for making bad movies with disgusting jewish social engineering in them. Or being a John who bought prostitutes with nice career opportunities. Not rape.
Can you not just revel in a Dirty jew going down?
Can you not just revel in a Dirty jew going down?
Not in this case. It's somehow even sadder that even when a dirty Jew goes down the goyim lose.
Only one of them had to be the sacrificial pig. Now we have a judicial precedent that will be used by lawyers to further emasculate all of society. And guess who the lawyers are! Do you see how this works?
Not in this case. It's somehow even sadder that even when a dirty Jew goes down the goyim lose.
Only one of them had to be the sacrificial pig. Now we have a judicial precedent that will be used *by lawyers* to further emasculate all of society. And guess who the lawyers are! Do you see how this works?
(post is archived)