You know, reading the full EO and the context in which it is relevant, I now have doubts as well. I can admit that I could have learned something untrue.
Still, there had to have been something that he did that the jews found deserving of culling him. Why would they risk a public assassination, especially if everything was already going as planned? His successor L.B.J. brought a whole slew of destructive agendas, like the 1965 Immigration Act. To me it always seemed like they wanted him out of the picture, clearing the way for L.B.J.
You know, reading the full EO and the context in which it is relevant, I now have doubts as well. I can admit that I could have learned something untrue.
Still, there had to have been something that he did that the jews found deserving of culling him. Why would they risk a public assassination, especially if everything was already going as planned? His successor L.B.J. brought a whole slew of destructive agendas, like the 1965 Immigration Act. To me it always seemed like they wanted him out of the picture, clearing the way for L.B.J.
(post is archived)