I'm against this 100%. Banks shouldn't be liable for what their clients do with their money. Convict the bad person, and make them pay. The banks shouldn't be monitoring clients' transactions at all.
This ruling just empowers the financial surveillance state, which the banks are part of.
I'm against this 100%. Banks shouldn't be liable for what their clients do with their money. Convict the bad person, and make them pay. The banks shouldn't be monitoring clients' transactions at all.
This ruling just empowers the financial surveillance state, which the banks are part of.
This ruling just empowers the financial surveillance state, which the banks are part of.
I don't like your internet personality much, but I can appreciate your ability to see the cracks.
> This ruling just empowers the financial surveillance state, which the banks are part of.
I don't like your internet personality much, but I can appreciate your ability to see the cracks.
(post is archived)