Good presentation. I admire their tenacity.
Dr. Piers Robinson presents IC911's new study entitled "Manual or Automated? A Flight Simulation Study and Analysis of Reported Aircraft Maneuvers on September 11, 2001." The reported can be found at: https://ic911.org/reports/manual-or-a...
Dr. Robinson’s presentation provides a cogent 40-minute summary of the study’s central finding that the routes flown on 9/11 were consistent with automated control and not with manual control by hijacker pilots.
The event also featured an illuminating panel discussion with researchers Michael Kobs and Aidan Monaghan, both of whose seminal work, done in the early 2010s, the study was built upon.
The study’s release dovetails with a newly published linguistic analysis commissioned by IC911 that casts serious doubt on whether radio transmissions that purportedly came from American Airlines Flight 11 were actually made by alleged hijacker Mohamed Atta (https://ic911.org/reports/linguistic-analysis-of-american-airlines-flight-11-transmissions-purported-to-be-made-by-mohamed-atta-on-11-september-2001/
Taken together, the two studies contribute substantial new evidence undermining the official story’s core claim that Islamic fundamentalists commandeered and flew the aircraft involved in the events of 9/11.
0:00 Introduction
5:46 Presentation: Manual or Automated?
45:23 Panel Discussion
Good presentation. I admire their tenacity.
>Dr. Piers Robinson presents IC911's new study entitled "Manual or Automated? A Flight Simulation Study and Analysis of Reported Aircraft Maneuvers on September 11, 2001." The reported can be found at: https://ic911.org/reports/manual-or-a...
>
Dr. Robinson’s presentation provides a cogent 40-minute summary of the study’s central finding that the routes flown on 9/11 were consistent with automated control and not with manual control by hijacker pilots.
>
The event also featured an illuminating panel discussion with researchers Michael Kobs and Aidan Monaghan, both of whose seminal work, done in the early 2010s, the study was built upon.
>
The study’s release dovetails with a newly published linguistic analysis commissioned by IC911 that casts serious doubt on whether radio transmissions that purportedly came from American Airlines Flight 11 were actually made by alleged hijacker Mohamed Atta (https://ic911.org/reports/linguistic-analysis-of-american-airlines-flight-11-transmissions-purported-to-be-made-by-mohamed-atta-on-11-september-2001/
>
Taken together, the two studies contribute substantial new evidence undermining the official story’s core claim that Islamic fundamentalists commandeered and flew the aircraft involved in the events of 9/11.
>
0:00 Introduction
5:46 Presentation: Manual or Automated?
45:23 Panel Discussion
Login or register