While there is much good information and many good questions raised in this video, the whole thing is marred by the rather quick determination that the buildings were destroyed by "directed energy weapons". This is the conclusion that they assert over and over again without providing any documented evidence of the existence of a real weapon capable of such a thing. Instead they offer up a bunch of hokey theories based on an equally incredible "apparatus" from a sketchy guy from forty years ago. Until there exists some real world, measurable evidence that a DEW of any kind is capable of such destruction, it is merely speculation and just as suspect as any other claims like thermite, nukes or conventional controlled demolition.
I want real answers just like anyone else. I don't want unprovable theories wrapped in "science" and "independent experts" to be pushed off as truth just because it goes counter to the official stories. I have a million questions and doubts on this matter but I am not going to suspend my disbelief and agree with these theories just because they make a few compelling points and a whole lot of outrageous claims as well. I don't buy the official explanation and I also don't buy the speculative stories like this one. I need real evidence. I need real truth. No one has that yet. We're being lied to by everyone involved, officially or otherwise. At this point I am more willing to believe it was space aliens than DEWs because I at least have my own personal evidence that space aliens may exist. I don't have that for DEWs.
I just want the real truth. I fear we will never get it.
I don't think how it was done should be the main concern. The crux of the biscuit is that the collapse of those three buildings in that manner couldn't possibly have been caused by two aircraft. Our focus should be on the liars, not the lie.
I don't think how it was done should be the main concern.
But how it was done is important to the fact that those who did it could have the power to do it again or do something worse. We need to know if it was a one time thing or a threat that can be used against us over and over again.
Our focus should be on the liars, not the lie.
Again it is important to know the how so we can know the who. If we don't know the how, we can't be certain we have identified everyone involved in the crime and the lies surrounding it. Obscuring the how allows the most important perpetrators to hide in the shadows and escape our wrath. They all need to die for their crimes.
I agree that how it was done is important. But rather than have Judy Woods-types throw out various theories, we could get the "how" from the perpetrators themselves.
We know the "five dancing israelis", and "the b-thing", and Gelatin, and Dominik Suter, and Urban Moving Systems all played a direct role in the events at the WTC that day. If we had proper FBI, those people would be in Gitmo getting waterboarded...and we would know the "how".
This!
Cant all the sides of the argument agree that it was planned. And move along from there?
(post is archived)