WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

573

To be honest I haven't been using DDG for a couple of years, basically right when I found out that it was founded and operated by an oven dodger. This sort of shit will always happen when jews are involved.

To be honest I haven't been using DDG for a couple of years, basically right when I found out that it was founded and operated by an oven dodger. This sort of shit will always happen when jews are involved.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I looked into it and didn't think it was kiked, but unfortunately it's not very good. At the time they were limiting results to just a page or two for each search and saying that should be enough for anyone.

that's a sign of them being cheap and not spending to have more bandwidth, I get why sites like this one will only show a page of search results cuz spamming search can be used to slow down a site. But brave should have a robust search engine.

[–] 0 pt

I agree. Well it could be that or a few other things but it ultimately comes down to not being a good replacement even if their heart is in the right place.

yeah really they are a browser which I give them credit for on being better than ones such as firefox or safari or whatever. So they don't have a good search engine, that is secondary I guess.

[–] 0 pt

It was better. It used to mirror DDG exactly but then it deviated, which is likely a step in the right direction. But it also means it isn't as good. It would be nice to have a user script that puts DDG results under the brave ones (if they are unique) so your results are Brave unless they suck and you can just scroll down.

[–] 0 pt

DDG results have always been Google results. They have never been uncensored, just privacy protected. I made the example elsewhere of wanting better news than CNN, but then picking a news source that just posts stories from CNN in a different order. That's basically what DDG does just with Google.