Just fyi, scotus long ago ruled that private ownership does not always allow censorship. If a private space has historically offered and especially advertised as free speech or became a defacto town square, it is in fact a constitutional violation for each and every censorship offense. As Twitter, facebook, and youtube were originally offered as free speech platforms, technically, according to established federal laws and legal precedent, it is illegal and unconstitutional to censor people on these platforms regardless of ownership status. If only we were a country of laws, ruled by laws.