Arizona ranchers along the border get fuk’d by ZOG courts every time. Living along the border is a nightmare.
Arizona ranchers along the border get fuk’d by ZOG courts every time. Living along the border is a nightmare.
. . . Under Arizona law, 'a person is justified in threatening or using physical force against another when, and to the extent a reasonable person would believe that physical force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful physical force.'
It could be used as a defense when homeowners attack — or potentially even kill — someone to stop certain crimes like murder, rape or armed robbery.
The Stand Your Ground laws are not permitted as a defense, however, when there was only a verbal provocation or the homeowner who is claiming self-defense provoked the attack.
By using the Stand Your Ground laws as a defense, prosecutors have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant was not justified in using deadly force in self-defense.
>.
.
.
Under Arizona law, 'a person is justified in threatening or using physical force against another when, and to the extent a reasonable person would believe that physical force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful physical force.'
>It could be used as a defense when homeowners attack — or potentially even kill — someone to stop certain crimes like murder, rape or armed robbery.
>The Stand Your Ground laws are not permitted as a defense, however, when there was only a verbal provocation or the homeowner who is claiming self-defense provoked the attack.
>By using the Stand Your Ground laws as a defense, prosecutors have to **prove beyond a reasonable doubt** that a defendant was not justified in using deadly force in self-defense.
(post is archived)