Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

632

NSFW is a blunt tool, a big hammer that has suited many parts of the internet just fine for decades. There seems to be some understanding of what "work" would deem appropriate or not, even if it wouldn't matter at one's particular workplace.

Is there merit in adding more grades to the scale?

  • G
  • PG(-13)
  • R
  • X

Theoretically there are no users under 13 on the net because of whatever that law is.

Thoughts?

NSFW is a blunt tool, a big hammer that has suited many parts of the internet just fine for decades. There seems to be some understanding of what "work" would deem appropriate or not, even if it wouldn't matter at one's particular workplace. Is there merit in adding more grades to the scale? * G * PG(-13) * R * X Theoretically there are no users under 13 on the net because of whatever that law is. Thoughts?

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

Rates G for Gay.

I like the idea though.

[–] • 2 pts

NSFW is pretty much meaningless now. Saying there are only two genders is NSFW. You can pretty much slap it on anything. A system that is more descriptive would be cool but the movie rating system still falls short. Just tell me what I'm getting into by clicking on the link. Porn? Violence? TDS inducing material?

[–] • 2 pts

I like the idea, but I have a problem with it:

Who gets to decide and rate content?

[–] • 0 pt

I guess self-rated. Mods can amend?

[–] • 2 pts

Initially part of me likes it, but I'll think about it more and see what I can come up with.

[–] • 0 pt

Might be a solution in search of a problem. But I decided to share the idea anyway

[–] • 1 pt

It might be but its worth mentioning so I'll say I think it brings a good idea to the table.

[–] • 1 pt

Good idea. So much that is flagged as NSFW really isn't. I think it is overused here, but how to correct that, who knows.