Score and counts don't represent quality accurately. Many people just upvote posts based on the post title, the poster or just because they upvote most everything. That doesn't indicate that the post is quality or not. On top of that, define post/comment quality in an objective manner. You cannot do it objectively because it is purely subjective. We'll have to decide for ourselves what quality content is. Showing a fake and gay score will lead to more false upvoting of mediocre content simply because a lot of sheep will get caught up in the momentum of "big number good" rather than actually actually reading/seeing the content. This idea will promote more bad interactions. I know you'll fight me on this because you get butthurt easily and fight me on everything else we've interacted on, but what I said is based on truth that's been seen everywhere such an arbitrary ranking system exists. Sorry but that's how it is IRL.