WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

211

yes.

sometimes a user replies with a comment that is then read, then the user adds valuable (or useless) text to said comment. the edit can be easily be missed since it triggers no notification.

suggestion: when a user edits a reply to let's say a comment of mine then mark it and unread in my inbox. (Makes sense because I haven't read their edit)

Makes sense?

yes. sometimes a user replies with a comment that is then read, then the user adds valuable (or useless) text to said comment. the edit can be easily be missed since it triggers no notification. suggestion: when a user edits a reply to let's say a comment of mine then mark it and unread in my inbox. (Makes sense because I haven't read their edit) Makes sense?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

By the time you read your reply, you probably see all the latest edits. It points to the database; not keeping old copies around like at&t apparently has me texting my high school sweetheart 2 decades ago.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

By the time you read your reply, you probably see all the latest edits.

probably. my suggestion doesn't need any edit history though. right now I've read your comment so it's marked as read in the inbox. problem is if you edit your comment in one hour then I'll not get updated about it. my suggestion is just to mark your comment as unread again in my inbox when you edit it, nothing more than that really. So in best case (depending on how the code works) switching one boolean essentially or setting the read_at timestamp to NIL or something.