I kind of see it as weaponization of facets of language and law for the purposes of lawfare in international theaters inside countries w/ laws about art censorship but also stifling hate speech laws... theoretically speaking ofc. Anyways not all my ideas are good and I don't pretend they are. Fling enough shit tho and some will stick :) I also like how it completely negates the concept of 'modern art'. If shit on a canvas can be art then so can their so called hate speech.
Satire for serious matter is counterproductive.
Look at BB, we thought it was all fun until we realized it is owned by a jew. That same happened to The Onions, bought by jews right before 2016 Election, who happen to be close friends with the Clintons.
Breitbart? Andrew Breitbart wasn't genetically jewish but he was adopted and raised by them. Splitting hairs I know.
jews decide who gets mainstream. And if you do it naturally, they eventually buy you out and turn you into a honey pot, and if they can’t, they shut you down by any means.
(post is archived)