Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Satire is used to ridicule and mock something, and TBH calling out the genocide of Whites by jews is a serious topic.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I kind of see it as weaponization of facets of language and law for the purposes of lawfare in international theaters inside countries w/ laws about art censorship but also stifling hate speech laws... theoretically speaking ofc. Anyways not all my ideas are good and I don't pretend they are. Fling enough shit tho and some will stick :) I also like how it completely negates the concept of 'modern art'. If shit on a canvas can be art then so can their so called hate speech.

[–] • 1 pt

Satire for serious matter is counterproductive.

Look at BB, we thought it was all fun until we realized it is owned by a jew. That same happened to The Onions, bought by jews right before 2016 Election, who happen to be close friends with the Clintons.

[–] • 0 pt

Breitbart? Andrew Breitbart wasn't genetically jewish but he was adopted and raised by them. Splitting hairs I know.

[–] • 1 pt

well that covers a couple of you anyway

[–] • 3 pts

We could also add that it's a 'living online art project' critiquing modern culture.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Also it directly creates a constitutional issue for many countries that prohibit banning art but have hate speech laws. I'm telling you a disclaimer that this is a living art project theoretically opens the door for theoretical legal challenges on the basis of what constitutes art, free speech, and hate speech. ANyways maybe it's a dumb idea @aou I'm stoned as hell.

[–] • 0 pt

it's like the enemy of my enemy type shit. I love and cherish free speech but simultaneously i hate what modern art has become. If shit on a canvas can be art then hate speech isn't real. Simple as.