WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

330

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Regarding the OP idea: One thing that would concern me it it were made an actual requirement, would be that someone could potentially just look at other introduction posts to see how those required questions should be answered and then just copy>paste the answers. Having people answer them in a non-required fashion and write them 'in their own words' allows for their responses to be analyzed - word usage, whether they might barely know English, or whether they merely dismiss the questions because it is just 'other people' asking them and they aren't required to be answered.

I like it being a kind of non-forced requirement that allows for them to either answer or dismiss the questions posed by others to get a decent idea of the nature of the account and the person behind it.

Related matter: I've gone to reply to several introductions in the past with some links to important redpill posts on poal, but we're not able to post links in that sub even to other threads here on poal from what I recall. I don't think we can even link the welcome page or ToS, which would also be kind of useful. That is how I recall things being the last time I tried though, but perhaps this has changed or I am not remembering correctly. I'll try to test out posting 'internal' links again sometime soon.

I would really like to post a compilation of important redpill threads to newcomers sometimes, particularly the nigger and kike infodump threads. Perhaps assisting new accounts might not the objective of the sub, but primarily to see how the new accounts introduce themselves.

[–] 2 pts

I think links are still forbidden.

There is an requirement for them to be active in their own intro sub now that I think about it, but I'm not sure what exactly the stndards are.

At the end of the day if someone avoids answering those questions their silence says more than enough.