WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

The rapid fire machine gun blasts of posts are wiping new posts off the /s/all/new page in a matter of an hour or two.

A reasonable daily post limit should improve the quality of posts and reduce the occurance of redundant posts.

I think a 50 post limit would be like no limit for most posters, and amply liberal for prolific posters.

Thoughts?

The rapid fire machine gun blasts of posts are wiping new posts off the /s/all/new page in a matter of an hour or two. A reasonable daily post limit should improve the quality of posts and reduce the occurance of redundant posts. I think a 50 post limit would be like no limit for most posters, and amply liberal for prolific posters. Thoughts?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Na, I can just block people who spam clickbait / low quality trash.

Agree, but when 10%-20% of their posts are of something of interest to you, it becomes harder to block them because you do want to see their "quality" posts. Also, when reviewing current posts to avoid redundancy before posting something new, one might inadvertently miss a similar /same post by a blocked user. AOUs prescreen for redundancy works if the URLs are identical, but not if one is archived and the other not.