I mean i guess I am... but if making the top poster list is based on quality of content then I see no issue. Like perhaps only count posts above a floating score to prevent spammers from constantly trying to abuse the 1 free upvote. I don't have all the answers man. These are just ideas.
I mean i guess I am... but if making the top poster list is based on quality of content then I see no issue. Like perhaps only count posts above a floating score to prevent spammers from constantly trying to abuse the 1 free upvote. I don't have all the answers man. These are just ideas.
Who decides whats quality? I really dont care what happens, it doesnt concern me. Im here to entertain most likely. Haha, nah it is a good place to find news.
Nobody leaves anything good alone.
Who decides whats quality? I really dont care what happens, it doesnt concern me. Im here to entertain most likely. Haha, nah it is a good place to find news.
Nobody leaves anything good alone.
I think aou might be trying it as a metric and if it's a failure i personally apologize. I'm not good at what makes a site great.
I think aou might be trying it as a metric and if it's a failure i personally apologize. I'm not good at what makes a site great.
If popularity defines quality I see no difference to now. Unless you post more often.
If popularity defines quality I see no difference to now. Unless you post more often.
(post is archived)