WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

They should see this (pic8.co)

Maybe keep the flair though.

They should see [this](https://pic8.co/sh/tGndhs.png) Maybe keep the flair though.

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

not the worst idea

[–] 5 pts

I like that idea.

[–] [deleted] 5 pts

Yeah I'm down with that; keep the subversives out and the reddit levels dingbats looking to stir the (((shit))) storm through user names

[–] 2 pts

I think making Poal easily accessible for unpilled normies is the point of a free speech forum

remember that redditors are as racist/intolerant as anyone else, they are just choosing to hide it. They proved this by researching people's unconscious reactions to say interracial couples.

If they are here then it's a moment for them to taste the freedom of thought, before they have to go back to their reddit gulag to pretend to be outraged on the behalf of their useless violent pet subhumans again.

[–] 1 pt

The flip side is I can write a script to hit multiple sites to look for a username that's reused across platforms. If I am an HR recruiter I might want to see if dampcat has accounts on FB, Reddit, Twitter, poal, and other sites, as well as what they might be saying.

Additionally - imagine a reddit NPC coming here to look for their next cancel culture victim. The script above might provide enough linking info to determine an employer to harass.

[–] 0 pt

That's a certainly a possibility that new members should be aware of, certainly I've only used 'dampcat' on here and I borrowed it from a liberal on another forum, so I'd be amused if he gets some misplaced grief.

I'd imagine an AI with enough global data could easily match my writing patterns and personal stories to other forums though

I've looked up names before so it's certainly possible to pinpoint some careless people, especially those using their real name and job

[–] 0 pt

Or not using a VPN - I point my VPN to the USA to make it less obvious. Today I am from CA, tomorrow CO!

[–] 0 pt

I dont like logging in, i never make posts (I wouldn’t want some alphabet boy knocking at my door because i pissed off some nig or fag). However I like reading the content, the comments make it even more interesting, hilarious at times you can get a feel of how other people are feeling about certain situations without the watering down gay bullshit that that is forced by other sites, as far as some reddit ass hat coming in here, I don’t understand why you wouldnt want to let interesting arguments occur. (Hopefully my password still works after this post)

[–] 1 pt

Reddit asshats and interesting arguments do not overlap enough to be worried about losing that interaction.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Great idea! I would even advocate these become available at 10-15 points to prevent a zero point account from getting access.

[–] 0 pt

Hahahaha no. How would they get points of they can't access the ability to comment?

[–] 0 pt

Upvote posts? Contribute content?

[–] 0 pt

So spam the frontpage with anti-White, jew lies about muh White females sleeping with niggers? We already have enough NPC cucks on poal for that.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

That will force the glowies to make accounts.

By the way, can I interest any of you fellow patriots in writing a manifesto? I will even help you write it - you won't have to do any work at all, but you can take all the credit and be a popular celebrity when we do something patriotic like kidnapping some governor or shooting up a school! Won't that be fun!

[–] 2 pts

force

You are seriously dumb. It won't force a thing. Glowkikes goal is to interact. They already can't do that i f they don't have an account. Literally NOTHING changes from their position. This isn't to prevent glowkikes. This is to prevent reddit shills from scoping the place out and linking to (((discord))) shill groups.

[–] 0 pt

Glowkikes goal is to interact. They already can't do that.

How can they not interact? It is easy to create an account, harvest IP addresses and act as an agent provocateur. That said, the modification above, and the reasons for it are sound.

[–] 1 pt

To interact they were required to make an account. Under my suggestion this doesn't change. Nothing with regards to their position changes. Nothing at all. It doesn't "force them" to change or modify their behavior.

[–] -1 pt

this sounds like the idea a pedophile would think of...of course it's an Anticlutch idea

[–] -1 pt

Upvote because I see you're at -1 and we both know that was @anticlutch

[–] -1 pt

God damnit now I have the -1 !

[–] -1 pt

They need to be able to see the comments otherwise it is a form of censorship. Could give ids for the usernames etc. Usernames are already supposed to be anon though.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

...otherwise it is a form of censorship.

Shut up dude. No it wouldn't be. No. No it's not. This isn't a public forum. It's a private community. It requires adherence to rules outside the scope of the government and has a membership. The requirement to be a member to view comments is not even remotely muh censhorship.