Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

As is right now it will slowly shift colors. More and more reds will become more and more blues. This isn't bad but it feel opposite of what is intended.

Maybe not for the first 2 or 3 levels? Keep those a static point. Otherwise they would just keep being more and more unattainable.

e;

Below is current. Levels are ordered as below: Level 0 -> light blue Level 2 (40 points) -> green Level 6 (360 points)-> yellow Level 20 (4,000 points)-> orange Level 30 (9,000 points)-> red Level 50 (25,000 points)-> blue Poal logo Level 100 (100,000 points)-> red pill

My suggestion is; Level blue -> 0 - 39 points Level green -> 40 - 359 points Level yellow -> 360 - 3999 points Level orange 3999-> 8% top user (AOU) Level red -> 8%+1 - 15% etc.

As is right now it will slowly shift colors. More and more reds will become more and more blues. This isn't bad but it feel opposite of what is intended. Maybe not for the first 2 or 3 levels? Keep those a static point. Otherwise they would just keep being more and more unattainable. # **e;** Below is current. Levels are ordered as below: Level 0 -> light blue Level 2 (40 points) -> green Level 6 (360 points)-> yellow Level 20 (4,000 points)-> orange Level 30 (9,000 points)-> red Level 50 (25,000 points)-> blue Poal logo Level 100 (100,000 points)-> red pill My suggestion is; Level blue -> 0 - 39 points Level green -> 40 - 359 points Level yellow -> 360 - 3999 points Level orange 3999-> 8% top user (AOU) Level red -> 8%+1 - 15% etc.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (14).
[–] • 1 pt

Maybe there could be a special class for top ranked users, but at the same time having it structured the way it is incentivizes engagement and gives people something to work toward. The way you have described it encourages groupthink or pandering to get higher rankings. In the way you described it controversial members wouldn’t ever get a high status

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

The way you have described it encourages groupthink

Hahaha how the fuck does it do that? Do you have any idea what I even suggested?

Or pandering to get higher rankings.

As opposed to what it is now? My suggestion doesn't prevent or cause that. At all.

he way you described it controversial members wouldn’t ever get a high status

Behind AOU I am likely the most controversial member here.